Authors : Wandiereko Mercy Egolet; Dr. Arti Koul Kachroo

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 8 - August

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/y2muum85

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/djja9chk

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24AUG455

Abstract : This study investigates the awareness and perceptions of ChatGPT among a sample of 300 students and 50 teachers at Sharda University, employing the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) as the theoretical framework. Through the application of descriptive statistics and ANOVA analyses, the research aims to elucidate the multidimensional landscape surrounding ChatGPT integration in educational contexts. The objectives encompass (i) assessing the level of awareness among Sharda University students and teachers about ChatGPT, (ii) exploring their perceptions towards ChatGPT concerning demographic variables like age, gender, program affiliation, and years of studying/teaching, and (iii) proposing recommendations and strategies for optimizing the integration of ChatGPT into teaching and learning processes. The findings reveal varying levels of awareness and significant differences in perceptions across demographic variables, highlighting the importance of tailored implementation strategies and targeted promotional efforts guided by the UTAUT framework. Additionally, identified potential benefits, challenges, and concerns offer valuable insights into the complexities of ChatGPT integration, informing future research endeavours and strategic decision-making in educational settings within the UTAUT framework.endeavors.

Keywords : Artificial Intelligence (AI), Higher Education, ChatGPT, Education.

References :

1. Abdaljaleel, M., Barakat, M., Alsanafi, M., et al. (2024). A multinational study on the factors influencing university students’ attitudes and usage of ChatGPT. Scientific Reports, 14(1983).
2. Aguiar, F. B., Da Silva, A. A., Oliveira, F. R., &Meiriño, M. J. (2019). An extension of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) to explain the digital library use. Journal of Information Science, 45(2), 206-219.
3. Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa'deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating e-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 2, 100025.
4. Alaiad, A., & Zhou, L. (2014). Patients' acceptance of e-health services: An empirical study on Online appointment system. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(3), 571-592.
5. Alimi, A., Buraimoh, O., Aladesusi, G., &Babalola, E. (2021). University Students’ Awareness of, Access to, and use of Artificial Intelligence for Learning in Kwara State. Indonesian Journal of Teaching in Science, 1(2), 91-104. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijotis. v1i2.38014
6. Aleksić-Maslać, K., Borović, F., &Biočina, Z. (2024). Perception and Usage OfChatGPT in the Education System. In INTED2024 Proceedings (pp. 1842-1848). IATED.
7. Alessandro Zivelonghi, Alessandro Giuseppi. (2023). Smart Healthy Schools: an IoTEnabled Concept for Multi-Room Dynamic Air Quality Control. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems.
8. Chauhan, S., &Jaiswal, M. P. (2016). A study of UTAUT model based on technology acceptance. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 6(8), 27-31.
9. Cheng, Y. M., Li, C. Y., Wu, Y. H., & Hsu, M. H. (2019). Understanding the acceptance of electronic medical record system in tertiary hospital using UTAUT model. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2019, 1-8.
10. Christensen, C. M., &Eyring, H. J. (2011). The Innovative University: Changing the DNA of Higher Education from the Inside Out. John Wiley & Sons.
11. Christensen, C. M., &Raynor, M. E. (2003). The Innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth. Harvard Business Press.
12. Clark, R., & Jain, P. (2020). Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence in education: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 30(2), 345-375.
13. Cukurova, M., Miao, X., Brooker, R. (2023). Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Schools: Unveiling Factors Influencing Teachers’ Engagement. In Wang, N., Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Medina-Romero, M. Á., Huallpa, J., Flores-Arocutipa, J., Panduro, W., ChaucaHuete, L., Limo, F., Herrera, E., Callacna, R., Ariza Flores, V., Quispe, I., & Hernández, F. (Eds.), Exploring the ethical considerations of using Chat GPT in university education. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences (PEN), 11(4), 105-115. https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v11i4.3770
14. Elbanna, S., & Armstrong, L. (2024). Exploring the integration of ChatGPT in education: adapting for the future. Management & Sustainability: An Arab Review, 3(1), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1108/MSAR-03-2023-0016
15. Ezen-Can, A. (2021). Integrating natural language processing tools in education: A review of current trends and future directions. Journal of Educational Technology, 18(3), 215-230.
16. G20. (2023). G20 Leaders’ Declaration.
17. Gupta, B., Dasgupta, S., & Gupta, A. (2008). Adoption of ICT in a government organization: A UTAUT perspective. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 21(6), 649-670.
18. Hao, K. (2020). The rise of artificial intelligence in education. Harvard Educational Review, 90(4), 567-589.
19. Harvard University Initiative for Learning and Teaching. (n.d.). Using AI in education. Harvard University. Retrieved from https://hilt.harvard.edu/ using-ai-education
20. Iqbal, N., Ahmed, H., &Azhar, K. A. (2022). Exploring teachers’ attitudes towards using chatgpt. Global Journal for Management and Administrative Sciences, 3(4), 97-111.
21. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., &Ludgate, H. (2018). NMC horizon report: 2018 higher education edition. The New Media Consortium.
22. Knox, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence and education in China. Learning, Media and Technology. The University of Edinburgh. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 17439884.2020.1754236
23. Limna, P., Kraiwanit, T., Jangjarat, K., Klayklung, P., &Chocksathaporn, P. (2023). The use of ChatGPT in the digital era: Perspectives on chatbot implementation. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.32
24. Ma, Y., &Siau, K. L. (2018). Artificial Intelligence Impacts on Higher Education. Midwest 2018 Proceedings,42.https://aisel.aisnet.org/mwais2018/42
25. Mansor, N. A., Hamid, Y., Anwar, I. S. K., Isa, N. S. M., & Abdullah, M. Q. (2022). The awareness and knowledge on artificial intelligence among accountancy students. Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci, 12, 1629-1640.
26. McEwen, B. C., Duvall, M., &Sams, A. (2020). Teacher confidence in using educational technology tools: A literature review. TechTrends, 64(2), 152–159.
27. Miao, C., Qin, J., Xie, X., & Miao, C. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: Current applications and future perspectives. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(7), 1109-1138.
28. Miao, F., Holmes, W., Huang, R., Zhang, H., & UNESCO. (2021). AI and education: Guidance for policymakers.
29. Mogavi, M., Akhtari, N., &Alavi, M. (2023). ChatGPT: A comprehensive review and taxonomy of research. Journal of Information Science, 49(1), 23-43.
30. Mohd, Javaid.,Abid, Haleem., Ravi, Pratap, Singh., Shahbaz, Khan., Ibrahim, Haleem, Khan. (2023). Unlocking the opportunities through ChatGPT Tool towards ameliorating the education system. BenchCouncil transactions on benchmarks, standards and evaluations. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench. 2023.100115
31. National Education Policy. (2020). Ministry of Education, Government of India.
32. Njogu, A.M. (2023). The Use of Artificial Intelligence to Support Teachers and Students in Creating And Using Educational Content For Higher Education. Aalborg University: Copenhagen Campus.
33. OpenAI. (2021). ChatGPT: A conversational model fine-tuned from GPT-3. Retrieved from https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/
34. Partnership on AI. (n.d.). About us. Partnership on AI. Retrieved from https://www.partnershiponai.org/ about-us/
35. Rasul, T., Nair, S., Kalendra, D., Robin, M., de Oliveira Santini, F., Ladeira, W. J., ...&Heathcote, L. (2023). The Role of ChatGPT in Higher Education: Benefits, Challenges, and Future Research Directions. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1).
36. Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). War of the chatbots: Bard, Bing Chat, ChatGPT, Ernie and beyond. The new AI gold rush and its impact on higher education. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 364-389. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023. 6.1.23
37. Saritha, D., Rekha, V., Pavani, M., Ambika, T., Rani, P. S., Manasa, B. B., &Priya, N. C. (2024). Exploring ChatGPT: A Comprehensive Analysis of Performance, User Perception, and Satisfaction. IJO-International Journal of Business Management (ISSN 2811-2504), 7(02), 01-15.
38. Shokri, A., &Daraei, R. (2021). The role of artificial intelligence in education. Journal of Educational Technology, 17(2), 145-167.
39. Slepankova, M. (2021). Possibilities of Artificial Intelligence in Education: An Assessment of the Role of AI Chatbots as a Communication Medium in Higher Education. Linnaeus University.
40. Stanford Teaching Commons. (n.d.). Teaching with technology. Stanford University. Retrieved from https://teachingcommons.stanford.edu/teaching-talk/teaching-technology
41. Strzelecki, A. (2023). To use or not to use ChatGPT in higher education? A study of students’ acceptance and use of technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 10494820.2023.2209881
42. Thaler, R., Smith, J., & Brown, T. (2021). Understanding the role of artificial intelligence in education: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(1), 47-63.
43. UNESCO. (2017). Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Development. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
44. UNESCO. (2021). Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
45. University of Michigan Center for Research on Learning and Teaching. (n.d.). AI literacy. University of Michigan. Retrieved from https://crlt.umich.edu/ai-literacy
46. UC Berkeley Division of Data Sciences. (n.d.). AI education. University of California, Berkeley. Retrieved from https://data.berkeley.edu/education/ai
47. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
48. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., &Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178.
49. Zhou, T., Lu, Y., & Wang, B. (2010). Integrating TTF and UTAUT to explain mobile banking user adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 760-767