Authors : Nitya Shree R; Divyashree S; Neha G; Pooja Kulkarni; Poornima K

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 11 - November

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/ms44ayce

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/y7x5wv96

DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14413971

Abstract : It is the most popular channels for communication in social media. But few people use these platforms for evil intent, and "cyberbullying" is a particularly common occurrence. Cyberbullying is particularly common among young people and entails using technological methods to harass or injure others. Therefore,the aimofthisstudy isto suggest a deeplearning algorithm-based model for identifying cyberbullying. The Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) approach was used to forecast bullying incidents using three datasets from Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. The outcomes showed thatan efficient model for identifying cyberbullying has been developed, resolving issues with earliermethods of cyberbullying detection. For the Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook datasets, the model's accuracies were roughly 96.64%, 94.49% and 91.26%, respectively.

References :

1. P. Fortuna and S. Nunes, ‘‘A survey on automatic detection of hate speech in text,’’ ACM   Comput. Surv., vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 1–30, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1145/3232676.
2. M. H. Obaid, S. K. Guirguis, and S. M. Elkaffas, ‘‘Cyberbullying detection and severity determination model,’’ IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 97391–97399, 2023,doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3313113.
3. J. Yadav, D. Kumar, and D. Chauhan, ‘‘Cyber bullying detection using pre trained BERT model,’’ in Proc. Int. Conf. Electron. Sustain. Commun. Syst. (ICESC), Jul. 2020, pp. 1096– 1100, doi:10.1109/ICESC48915.2020. 9155700.
4. K. Shah, C. Phadtare, and K. Rajpara, ‘‘Cyber- bullying detection in hinglish languages using machine learning,’’ Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 439–447, May 2022.
5. C. Iwendi, G. Srivastava, S. Khan, and P. K. R. Maddikunta, ‘‘Cyberbully ing detection solutions based on deep learning architectures,’’ Multimedia Syst., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1839–1852, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s00530-020 00701-5.
6. A. Dewani, M. A. Memon, and S. Bhatti, ‘‘Cyberbullying              detection:              Advanced preprocessing techniques & deep learning architecture for Roman Urdu data,’’ J. Big Data, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–20, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1186/s40537-021-00550-7.
7. V. V. and H. P. D. Adolf, ‘‘Multi modal cyber bullying detection using hybrid deep learning algorithms,’’ Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res., vol. 16, no. 7, p. 568, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.37622/ijaer/16.7.2021.568-574.
8. M. W. Habib and Z. N. Sultani, ‘‘Twitter sentiment analysis using different machine learning and feature extraction techniques,’’ Al- Nahrain J. Sci., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 50–54, Sep. 2021.
9. N. Haydar and B. N. Dhannoon, ‘‘A comparative study of cyberbullying detection in social media for the last five years,’’ Al-Nahrain J. Sci., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 47–55, 2023.
10. V. Balakrishnan, S. Khan, and H. R. Arabnia, ‘‘Improving cyberbully ing detection using Twitter users’ psychological features and machine learning,’’ Comput. Secur., vol. 90, Mar. 2020, Art. no. 101710, doi: 10.1016/j.cose.2019.101710.