⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



Assessment of Productive Performance, Morphological Characteristics, and Socioeconomic Impacts of Rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) Farming in Carcar City, Philippines: Contributions to SDGs


Authors : Arnold Capin Valleser; Susan Marie M. Semblante; Kristine Kaye Satomera; Rafael B. Alquiza; Earl James V. Maning

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 5 - May


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/m5ueupj8

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/mrb2bcvw

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26May1809

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : This study characterized the phenotypic traits, morphometric parameters, and production profile of domestic rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) across 13 barangays in Carcar City, Cebu, to establish baseline data supporting the development and sustainability of the local rabbit industry, aligned with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 1, 2, and 15. Data were collected from February to April 2025 through structured interviews and direct measurements of 203 rabbit specimens and 40 raisers, and descriptive statistics and correlation analyses were performed following standard FAO protocols. Results revealed that New Zealand White is the dominant breed, followed by Californian and Chinchilla, while other breeds exist in small numbers for hobby or niche purposes. Phenotypically, the population is characterized by predominantly solid coat colors, long and narrow ears, straight facial and nasal profiles, compact or commercial body types, smooth coats, and red eyes. Most individuals exhibited a moderately docile temperament, with an average of 8.39 teats and narrow foot pads. Morphometric measurements showed low variability in most structural traits, indicating a stable, locally adapted population, though high variation in body length and heart girth reflected differences in management and nutrition. Statistical analysis showed no significant sexual dimorphism, suggesting uniform growth patterns between sexes. Management factors, such as the source of stock and rearing purpose, significantly influenced phenotypic expression. These findings highlight limited genetic diversity and gaps in record-keeping and technical practices. The study recommends implementing standardized management, improved breeding programs, and enhanced extension services to strengthen productivity, ensure genetic conservation, and support sustainable livelihoods in the region.

Keywords : Phenotypic Characterization, Morphometric Traits, Genetic Diversity, Descriptive-Correlational Study, Breeds Rabbit.

References :

  1. Philippine Statistics Authority. (2015). Population projections by province, region, and selected cities: 2015–2045. https://psa.gov.ph/content/population-projections-philippines-2015-2045.
  2. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
  3. Medenilla, V. (2021). A basic guide to raising rabbits for food. Manila Bulletin Special News. https://mb.com.ph/2021/02/18/a-basic-guide-to-raising-rabbits-for-food/13
  4. Veneracion, A. (2017). An overview of the rabbit industry in the philippines. monthly agriculture.https://agriculture.com.ph/2017/11/21/an-overview-of-the-rabbit-industry-in-thephilippines/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR2nO2dx8VhEjsdKaawh8EmWQIjv1yymVQCsYpOiqelpoHlYJFmmppswRtQ_aem_tVjq8VqCDuHywBqVkIRniw
  5. Khan, S., Khan, M. H., Muhammad, S., Kaleem, K., Shah, P., Khan, A., & Khan, N. (2017). Phenotypic and morphometric characteristics of angora rabbits in rabbit model farm jabba mansehra khyber pakhtunkhwa-pakistan. J. Biol. Agric. Healthc, 7,68-71. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Phenotypic+and+Morphometric+characteristics+of+Angora+Rabbits++in+Rabbit+Model+Farm+JabbaMansehra+Khyber++Pakhtunkhwa-Pakistan&btnG=#
  6. OpenSTAT. (2024). Livestock inventory by region and province: Rabbit, July 2024. Philippine Statistics Authority. https://openstat.psa.gov.ph.
  7. Philippine Statistics Authority. (2015). Population projections by province, region, and selected cities: 2015–2045. https://psa.gov.ph/content/population-projections-philippines-2015-2045.
  8. The Philippine Star. (2024, March 18). Demand for rabbit meat drops amid recovery of pig industry.
  9. FAO. The State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization Rome; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  10. Dalle Zotte, A. (2014). Rabbit farming for meat purposes. Animal Frontiers, 4, 62-67. https://doi.org/10.2527/af.2014-0035
  11. Ogbonna, C. I. (2015). Prospects and challenges of rabbit production in Nigeria. Journal of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 3(2), 45–52.
  12. [ 10 ] McNitt, J. I., Lukefahr, S. D., Cheeke, P. R., & Patton, N. M. (2013). Rabbit production handbook (5th ed.). Interstate Publishers.
  13. Serem, J. K., Okeny, S. O., & Kiptoo, C. K. (2013). Technical constraints affecting rabbit production in smallholder farms. Journal of Agriculture, Science and Technology, 15(3), 78–90.
  14. Sylvester, G. B., Onyango, C. M., & Okeyo, A. M. (2014). Adoption and constraints of rabbit farming among smallholder farmers. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 26(5), Article 81.
  15. Tembachako, L., & Mrema, J. P. (2016). Value chain analysis of rabbit production: Opportunities and constraints. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 7(14), 45–53.
  16. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
  17. QuestionPro Survey Software (2021) Descriptive Research: Definition, Characteristics, [ 1 ] [ 15 ] Methods, Examples and Advantages. https://www.questionpro.com/blog/descriptive-research/
  18. Office of Research Integrity. (2017). Snowball sampling: Guidance for investigators. Oregon State University. https://research.oregonstate.edu/irb/policies-and-guidance-investigators/guidance/snowball-sampling
  19. Moreki, J., Mpho, K. and Manyeula, F. (2019) A survey in rabbit production in the city of gaborone, botswana. Journal of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 4, Article No. 9C4B91A72. https://doi.org/10.31248/JASVM2019.143
  20. Paladan, N. N. (2022). Management Practices of an Emerging Rabbit Production. https://doi.org/10.51193/IJAER.2022.8502
  21. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2013). Phenotypic characterization of animal genetic resources. FAO Animal Production and Health Guidelines No. 11. https://www.fao.org/3/i3250e/i3250e.pdf
  22. Chacón, E., Hernández, F., & Galina, M. A. (2011). Phenotypic characterization of rabbit populations in tropical regions: Morphological measures and racial identification. World Rabbit Science, 19(3), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2011.928
  23. Sarmiento, B. (2021). Rabbit farming in the Philippines: Status, prospects, and challenges. Philippine Journal of Animal Science, 58(1), 1–12.
  24. Khatun, M. A., Islam, M. S., & Ali, M. Y. (2016). Rabbit farming: A potential source of income and nutrition for rural people. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 14(1–2), 121–130.
  25. Chacón, E., Hernández, F., & Galina, M. A. (2011). Phenotypic characterization of rabbit populations in tropical regions: Morphological measures and racial identification. World Rabbit Science, 19(3), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2011.928
  26. American Rabbit Breeders Association. (2021). Standard of Perfection (21st ed.). American Rabbit Breeders Association.
  27. Bates, A. (2025, October 8). 12 adorable rabbit colors & patterns. Hepper Pet Resources. https://articles.hepper.com/rabbit-colors-patterns/
  28. Cosgrove, N. (2025, November 18). 44 vet-verified rabbit coat colors & patterns. The Vet Desk. https://thevetdesk.com/pet-lifestyle/rabbits/rabbit-coat-colors-patterns/
  29. McLeod, L. (2025, July 6). An overview of rabbit fur colors and patterns. The Spruce Pets. https://www.thesprucepets.com/rabbit-fur-colors-1237189
  30. Stern, M., & Cruickshank, J. (2022, April). Understanding the genetics behind rabbit coat colors: Part 2. OSU Extension Service. https://extension.oregonstate.edu/catalog/understanding-genetics-behind-rabbit-coat-colors-part-2-coat-color-genes
  31. Robinson, R. (1958). Genetics of the rabbit. Bibliographia Genetica, 17, 229–343.
  32. Weisbroth, S. H., Flatt, R. E., & Kraus, A. L. (Eds.). (2013). The biology of the laboratory rabbit. Academic press.
  33. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2015). The second report on the state of the world’s animal genetic resources for food and agriculture. FAO.
  34. Strickberger, M. W. (2005). Genetics (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
  35. Mathew, E., & Mathew, L. (2023). Conservation of landraces and indigenous breeds: An investment for the future. In Conservation and sustainable utilization of bioresources (pp. 291-321). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
  36. Sponenberg, D. P., & Bixby, A. L. (2007). Conservation genetics of domestic animals. CABI.
  37. Cheeke, P. R. (1987). Rabbit production: Principles and practice. Academic Press.
  38. Frankham, R., Ballou, J. D., & Briscoe, D. A. (2010). Introduction to conservation genetics (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  39. McManus, C., Louvandini, H., & Paiva, S. R. (2010). Morphological and physiological adaptations of sheep and goats to tropical environments. Small Ruminant Research, 93(1), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2010.05.006
  40. Falconer, D. S., & Mackay, T. F. C. (1996). Introduction to quantitative genetics (4th ed.). Longman.
  41. Boissy, A., Fisher, A. D., Bouissou, M. F., & Le Neindre, P. (2005). Genetics of fear and reactivity in livestock. Livestock Production Science, 93(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.11.003
  42. Grandin, T., & Deesing, M. J. (2014). Genetics and behavior in domestic animals. Academic Press.
  43. Miranda-de la Lama, G. C., & Mattiello, S. (2010). The importance of human–animal relationships in livestock farming. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 9(4), e82. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2010.e82
  44. Hemsworth, P. H., & Coleman, G. J. (2011). Human–animal interactions in livestock production (2nd ed.). CABI.
  45. Rushen, J., Taylor, A. A., & de Passillé, A. M. (2008). Domestic animals’ fear of humans and its effect on their welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 113(1–3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.01.013
  46. Goddard, M. E., & Wray, N. R. (2006). Heritability of behavioral traits. Journal of Animal Science, 84(Suppl_13), E14–E21. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-84.E14
  47. Rothschild, M. F., & Ruvinsky, A. (Eds.). (2011). The genetics of the pig (2nd ed.). CABI.
  48. Strickberger, M. W. (2005). Genetics (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
  49. Obermier, D. R., Howard, J. T., Gray, K. A., & Knauer, M. T. (2023). The impact of functional teat number on reproductive throughput in swine. Translational Animal Science, 7(1), txad100. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txad100
  50. Fontanesi, L., Beretti, F., Riggio, V., Dall’Olio, S., & Russo, V. (2010). Molecular genetics of coat color in domestic animals: From mutations to gene function. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 9(3), e51. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2010.e51
  51. Schmutz, S. M., & Berryere, T. G. (2007). Genes affecting coat colour and pattern in domestic animals: A review. Animal Genetics, 38(6), 539–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2007.01664.x
  52. Zhang, Y., Li, X., Wang, Z., & Liu, B. (2024). Genetic architecture and genomic selection of teat number in livestock: A review. Journal of Applied Genetics, 65(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13353-023-00824-9
  53. Lopes, M. S., Bastiaansen, J. W. M., Harlizius, B., Knol, E. F., & Bovenhuis, H. (2014). Genetic control of teat number in pigs: Estimates of genetic parameters and detection of quantitative trait loci. Journal of Animal Science, 92(5), 1886–1894. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-7261
  54. Van Son, M., Lopes, M. S., Martell, H. J., & Bovenhuis, H. (2017). Identification of candidate genes for teat number in pigs using genome‑wide association studies. Animal Genetics, 48(2), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/age.12522
  55. Enfield, F. D., & Rempel, W. E. (1961). Heritability of teat number and its relationship to litter size in swine. Journal of Animal Science, 20(3), 677–681. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1961.203677x
  56. Mwacharo, J. M., Okeyo, A. M., & Kamau, G. K. (2006). Morphological and genetic diversity in indigenous goat populations of East Africa. Small Ruminant Research, 61(2–3), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.07.012
  57. Solomon, F. F., Eshetu, M., & Haile, A. (2018). Phenotypic variation and characterization of indigenous goat types in different agro‑ecologies. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 50(7), 1479–1486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-018-1552-9
  58. Payne, W. J. A., & Wilson, R. T. (1999). An introduction to animal husbandry in the tropics (5th ed.). Blackwell Science.
  59. Solis, M., López, B., & Galina, M. A. (2020). Foot health and conformation in small ruminants: Effects of environment and management. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 23(4), 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2019.1698521
  60. Khan, B. B., Iqbal, J., & Mustafa, M. I. (2007). Morphometric traits as indicators of adaptation and production in goats. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 44(2), 345–350.
  61. Ojango, J. M. K., Pollott, G. E., & Okeyo, A. M. (2006). Genetic variation and relationships between linear type traits and production in dairy goats. Livestock Science, 102(1–2), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2005.12.007
  62. Payne, W. J. A., & Wilson, R. T. (1999). An introduction to animal husbandry in the tropics (5th ed.). Blackwell Science.
  63. Devendra, C., & Burns, M. (1983). Goat production in the tropics. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.
  64. Bhat, P. N., Khan, B. U., & Sharma, R. (2010). Conservation and improvement of indigenous livestock breeds in India. ICAR.
  65. Mahgoub, O., Lu, C. D., & Early, R. J. (2004). Use of body measurements to predict live weight and carcass traits in goats. Small Ruminant Research, 53(1–3), 247–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2003.08.015
  66. Mwacharo, J. M., Okeyo, A. M., & Kamau, G. K. (2006). Morphological and genetic diversity in indigenous goat populations of East Africa. Small Ruminant Research, 61(2–3), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.07.012
  67. Nielsen, H. M., Groeneveld, L. F., & Oldenbroek, J. K. (2013). In situ conservation of livestock breeds: Methods and applications. CABI.

This study characterized the phenotypic traits, morphometric parameters, and production profile of domestic rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) across 13 barangays in Carcar City, Cebu, to establish baseline data supporting the development and sustainability of the local rabbit industry, aligned with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 1, 2, and 15. Data were collected from February to April 2025 through structured interviews and direct measurements of 203 rabbit specimens and 40 raisers, and descriptive statistics and correlation analyses were performed following standard FAO protocols. Results revealed that New Zealand White is the dominant breed, followed by Californian and Chinchilla, while other breeds exist in small numbers for hobby or niche purposes. Phenotypically, the population is characterized by predominantly solid coat colors, long and narrow ears, straight facial and nasal profiles, compact or commercial body types, smooth coats, and red eyes. Most individuals exhibited a moderately docile temperament, with an average of 8.39 teats and narrow foot pads. Morphometric measurements showed low variability in most structural traits, indicating a stable, locally adapted population, though high variation in body length and heart girth reflected differences in management and nutrition. Statistical analysis showed no significant sexual dimorphism, suggesting uniform growth patterns between sexes. Management factors, such as the source of stock and rearing purpose, significantly influenced phenotypic expression. These findings highlight limited genetic diversity and gaps in record-keeping and technical practices. The study recommends implementing standardized management, improved breeding programs, and enhanced extension services to strengthen productivity, ensure genetic conservation, and support sustainable livelihoods in the region.

Keywords : Phenotypic Characterization, Morphometric Traits, Genetic Diversity, Descriptive-Correlational Study, Breeds Rabbit.

Paper Submission Last Date
30 - June - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe