Assessment of Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Radiation from Mobile Based Transceiving Stations


Authors : Akindele, B. A.; Akingbade, F. S.; Olowosebioba, A. A.; Afolabi, S. A.

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 3 - March


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3vx8kwvz

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/3e6e68ej

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25mar619

Google Scholar

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 15 to 20 days to display the article.


Abstract : Telecommunication has become an integral part of our lives which helps to provide and access a wide range of services including communication, entertainment, information and education. The widespread use of mobile phones and the installation of radio transmission antennas have raised global concerns about potential health risks associated with exposure to electromagnetic radiation. The objective of this study was to evaluate human exposure to radiofrequency (RF) radiation emitted by mobile base transceiver stations in Iba Community, Ojo Local Government Area, Lagos, Nigeria. An assessment was carried out by measuring the power density, electric field strength, and magnetic field strength over a distance of 100m from four base stations using TES 92 Electrosmog broadband survey meter. The results of the measurements were analysed and a model was developed to describe the distribution of RF radiation around a base station. The measured power densities spanned from the lowest to the highest values, 2.649mW/m2 to 34.950mW/m2 for MBTS 1, 4.427mW/m2 to 28.370mW/m2 for MBTS 2, 3.486mW/m2 to 37.120mW/m2 for MBTS 3, and 0.089mW/m2 to 17.730mW/m2 for MBTS 4 respectively with the highest value being approximately 0.8% of the ICNIRP limit of 4.5W/m2 . All the results were found to be below 4.5W/m2 for power density stipulated by the International Commission for Non Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). The correlation coefficient values of -0.5342, -0.5378, -0.4552 and -0.3465 also revealed that the RF emission should not present significant human health concern.

Keywords : Power Density, Radiofrequency Exposure Level, Electric Field Strength.

References :

  1. Ahlbom, A., Bridges, J., De Seze, R., Hillert, L., Juutilainen, J., Mattsson, M.-O., Neubauer, G., Schüz, J., Simko, M., & Bromen, K. (2008). Possible effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF) on human health--opinion of the scientific committee on emerging and newly identified health risks (SCENIHR). Toxicology, 246(2-3), 248-250.
  2. Annida, D., Oladoja, S., Oni, O., Isreal, E., Ajayi, O., & Aliagan, A. (2021). Assessment of radiofrequency radiation exposure level from selected base transceiver stations in Ogbomoso, Oyo State, Nigeria. Journal of Physics: Conference Series,
  3. Ayinmode, B., & Farai, I. (2013). Study of variations of radiofrequency power density from mobile phone base stations with distance. Radiation protection dosimetry, 156(4), 424-428.
  4. Ayinmode, B. O. (2019). Mapping Of Radiofrequency Exposure and Assessment Of Potential Health Hazard From Base Transceiving Stations And Common Mobile Phones In Selected Cities In Nigeria
  5. Balanis, C. A. (2005). Antenna theory analysis and design, A John Wiley & Sons. Inc., Publication, 811.
  6. Cardis, E., Richardson, L., Deltour, I., Armstrong, B., Feychting, M., Johansen, C., Kilkenny, M., McKinney, P., Modan, B., & Sadetzki, S. (2007). The INTERPHONE study: design, epidemiological methods, and description of the study population. European journal of epidemiology, 22(9), 647-664.
  7. Carlberg, M., Hedendahl, L., Koppel, T., & Hardell, L. (2019). High ambient radiofrequency radiation in Stockholm city, Sweden. Oncology letters, 17(2), 1777-1783.
  8. Choi, Y.-J., Moskowitz, J. M., Myung, S.-K., Lee, Y.-R., & Hong, Y.-C. (2020). Cellular phone use and risk of tumors: Systematic review and meta-analysis. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(21), 8079.
  9. Enyinna, P., & Avwir, G. (2010). Characterization of the radiofrequency radiation potential of Alakahia and Choba communities, Nigeria. Facta universitatis-series: Working and Living Environmental Protection, 7(1), 25-31.
  10. Foster, K. R., & Moulder, J. E. (2013). Wi-Fi and health: review of current status of research. Health physics, 105(6), 561-575.
  11. Gil, I., & Fernández-García, R. (2016). Study of the exposure to time-varying electric field in the ESEIAAT UPC School. 2016 Progress in Electromagnetic Research Symposium (PIERS),
  12. Hardell, L., Carlberg, M., & Mild, K. H. (2009). Epidemiological evidence for an association between use of wireless phones and tumor diseases. Pathophysiology, 16(2-3), 113-122.
  13. Hardell, L., & Sage, C. (2008). Biological effects from electromagnetic field exposure and public exposure standards. Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy, 62(2), 104-109.
  14. Hedendahl, L. K., Carlberg, M., Koppel, T., & Hardell, L. (2017). Measurements of radiofrequency radiation with a body-borne exposimeter in Swedish schools with Wi-Fi. Frontiers in public health, 5, 279.
  15. Heikkinen, P., Kosma, V.-M., Alhonen, L., Huuskonen, H., Komulainen, H., Kumlin, T., Laitinen, J., Lang, S., Puranen, L., & Juutilainen, J. (2003). Effects of mobile phone radiation on UV-induced skin tumourigenesis in ornithine decarboxylase transgenic and non-transgenic mice. International Journal of Radiation Biology, 79(4), 221-233.
  16. Hirata, A., Kodera, S., Sasaki, K., Gomez-Tames, J., Laakso, I., Wood, A., Watanabe, S., & Foster, K. R. (2021). Human exposure to radiofrequency energy above 6 GHz: Review of computational dosimetry studies. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 66(8), 08TR01.
  17. IARC, (2002). Non-ionizing Radiation: Static and extremely low-frequency (ELF) electric and magnetic fields.
  18. ICNIRP (2010). Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric and magnetic fields (1 Hz to 100 kHz). Health physics, 99(6), 818-836.
  19. ICNIRP, (2020). ICNIRP note: critical evaluation of two radiofrequency electromagnetic field animal carcinogenicity studies published in 2018. Health Physics, 118(5), 525-532.
  20. Ismail, A., Din, N. M., Jamaludin, M. Z., & Balasubramaniam, N. (2010). Mobile phone base station radiation study for addressing public concern. American journal of engineering and applied sciences, 3(1), 117-120.
  21. Kesari, K. K., Agarwal, A., & Henkel, R. (2018). Radiations and male fertility. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 16(1), 1-16.
  22. Kheifets, L., Afifi, A. A., & Shimkhada, R. (2006). Public health impact of extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields. Environmental health perspectives, 114(10), 1532-1537.
  23. Koppel, T., Ahonen, M., Carlberg, M., Hedendahl, L. K., & Hardell, L. (2019). Radiofrequency radiation from nearby mobile phone base stations-a case comparison of one low and one high exposure apartment. Oncol Lett, 18(5), 5383-5391. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10899
  24. Line, P., Cornelius, W. A., Bangay, M. J., & Grollo, M. (2000). Levels of Radiofrequency Radiation from GSM Mobile Telephone Base Stations. ARPANSA.
  25. Linhares, A., Terada, M. A. B., & Soares, A. J. M. (2013). Estimating the location of maximum exposure to electromagnetic fields associated with a radiocommunication station. Journal of Microwaves, Optoelectronics and Electromagnetic Applications, 12, 141-157.
  26. Lucas, J. (2015). What Is Electromagnetic Radiation. Live Science.
  27. Milani, M., Ballerini, M., Ferraro, L., Zabeo, M., Barberis, M., Cannone, M., & Faleri, M. (2001). Magnetic field effects on human lymphocytes. Electro-and Magnetobiology, 20(1), 81-106.
  28. Milham, S., & Ossiander, E. M. (2001). Historical evidence that residential electrification caused the emergence of the childhood leukemia peak. Medical Hypotheses, 56(3), 290-295.
  29. Olorunsola, A. B., Ikumapayi, O. M., Oladapo, B. I., Alimi, A. O., & Adeoye, A. O. (2021). Temporal variation of exposure from radio-frequency electromagnetic fields around mobile communication base stations. Scientific African, 12, e00724.
  30. Oluwafemi, I., Faluru, D., Ibikunle, F., & Adeoye, J. (2019). Investigation of RF Exposure Levels from Different Mobile Telecommunication Base Stations in Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria. European Journal of Scientific Research, 153(4), 393-402.
  31. Özdemir, F., & Kargi, A. (2011). Electromagnetic waves and human health. Electromagnetic Waves, 474-490.
  32. Phillips, J. L., Ivaschuk, O., Ishida-Jones, T., Jones, R. A., Campbell-Beachler, M., & Haggren, W. (1998). DNA damage in Molt-4 T-lymphoblastoid cells exposed to cellular telephone radiofrequency fields in vitro. Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics, 45(1), 103-110.
  33. Pozar, D. M. (2000). Microwave and RF design of wireless systems. John Wiley & Sons.
  34. Vecchia, P., Matthes, R., Ziegelberger, G., Lin, J., Saunders, R., & Swerdlow, A. (2009). Exposure to high frequency electromagnetic fields, biological effects and health consequences (100 kHz-300 GHz). International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, 378.
  35. Visser, H. J., Reniers, A. C., & Theeuwes, J. A. (2008). Ambient RF energy scavenging: GSM and WLAN power density measurements. 2008 38th European Microwave Conference,

Telecommunication has become an integral part of our lives which helps to provide and access a wide range of services including communication, entertainment, information and education. The widespread use of mobile phones and the installation of radio transmission antennas have raised global concerns about potential health risks associated with exposure to electromagnetic radiation. The objective of this study was to evaluate human exposure to radiofrequency (RF) radiation emitted by mobile base transceiver stations in Iba Community, Ojo Local Government Area, Lagos, Nigeria. An assessment was carried out by measuring the power density, electric field strength, and magnetic field strength over a distance of 100m from four base stations using TES 92 Electrosmog broadband survey meter. The results of the measurements were analysed and a model was developed to describe the distribution of RF radiation around a base station. The measured power densities spanned from the lowest to the highest values, 2.649mW/m2 to 34.950mW/m2 for MBTS 1, 4.427mW/m2 to 28.370mW/m2 for MBTS 2, 3.486mW/m2 to 37.120mW/m2 for MBTS 3, and 0.089mW/m2 to 17.730mW/m2 for MBTS 4 respectively with the highest value being approximately 0.8% of the ICNIRP limit of 4.5W/m2 . All the results were found to be below 4.5W/m2 for power density stipulated by the International Commission for Non Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). The correlation coefficient values of -0.5342, -0.5378, -0.4552 and -0.3465 also revealed that the RF emission should not present significant human health concern.

Keywords : Power Density, Radiofrequency Exposure Level, Electric Field Strength.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe