Assessment of Heavy Metals and Microbial Pollution in the Ganga River and its Source Streams at Panch Prayag, Uttarakhand, India


Authors : Prashant Kumar; Ashish Kothari; Shashi Ranjan Mani Yadav; Priya Kaushik; Dr. Madhur Uniyal

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 2 - February


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2yx7ym34

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/2zk7cb7h

DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14944866


Abstract : The Panch Pyayag Ganga River and its headstreams in Uttarakhand, India, hold significant cultural, ecological, and hydrological importance. However, increasing human activity, agricultural runoff, and industrial discharge threaten the river's health, potentially compromising its water quality. This study aims to assess the nutrient and microbial contamination levels in the Ganga River and its individual headstreams with a focus on identifying key pollution sources. Water samples were collected from multiple locations across the river system and analyzed for key parameters: biological oxygen demand, chemical oxygen demand, coliform bacteria, and other microbial indicators of contamination. The results revealed elevated levels of nutrients and microbial contaminants in specific stretches, correlating with nearby urban settlements, agricultural runoffs, and religious activities. The study highlights the need for comprehensive water quality management strategies that address the multi-faceted pollution sources affecting the river ecosystem. Understanding these contamination dynamics is essential for preserving the Ganga River’s ecological integrity and ensuring safe water access for millions of residents and pilgrims in the region.

Keywords : Sustainable Agriculture, Heavy Metals, Microbiological Analysis.

References :

  1. Behera S., Areendran G., Gautam P. and Sagar V. (2011). For a living Ganga–working with people and aquatic species. New Delhi, WWF-India, 1-84. Google Scholar
  2. Kumar V, Kumar S, Srivastava S, Singh J, Kumar P. Water quality of River Ganga with reference to physio-chemical and microbiological characteristics during Kanwar Mela 2017, at Haridwar, India: A case study. Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science. 2018; 3 (1):58-63. Google Scholar
  3. Kumar V, Chopra AK, Chauhan RK. Effects of textile effluents disposal on water quality of sub canal of Upper Ganga Canal at Haridwar (Uttarakhand), India. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research. 2012; 4(9):4206-11. Google Scholar
  4. Stephen Lonergan, Tracey Vansickle, Relationship between water quality and human health: A case study of the Linggi River Basin in Malaysia Social Science & Medicine Volume 33, Issue 8, 1991, Pages 937-946 Google Scholar
  5. K.S. Bilgrami & Sanjib Kumar Bacterial contamination in water of the River Ganga and its risk to human health Google Scholar
  6. Kiran Kumar Vadde , Jianjun Wang , Long Cao , Tianma Yuan , Alan J. McCarthy and Raju Sekar Assessment of Water Quality and Identification of Pollution Risk Locations in Tiaoxi River (Taihu Watershed), China : Water 2018, 10, 183; doi:10.3390/w10020183 Google Scholar
  7. Buffam, I., Turner, M.G., Desai, A.R., Hanson, P.C., Rusak, J.A., Lottig, N.R., Stanley, E.H., Carpenter, S.R., 2011. Integrating aquatic and terrestrial components to construct a complete carbon budget for a north temperate lake district. Glob. Chang. Biol. 17, 1193– 1211. Google Scholar 8. Paul D. Research on heavy metal pollution of river Ganga: A review. Annals of Agrarian Science. 2017 Jun 1; 15 (2):278-86. Google Scholar
  8. Mahipal Singh Sankhla, Mayuri Kumari, Kirti Sharma, Ravindra Singh Kushwah, Rajeev Kumar Heavy Metal Pollution of Holy River Ganga: A Review; International Journal of Research;vol 5 issue 1 2018: 424-435. Google Scholar
  9. Ali MM, Ali ML, Islam MS, Rahman MZ. Preliminary assessment of heavy metals in water and sediment of Karnaphuli River, Bangladesh. Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management. 2016 May 1; 5:27-35. Google Scholar
  10. Sinha SN, Vasudev K, Rao MV, Odetokun M. Quantification of organophosphate insecticides in drinking water in urban areas using lyophilisation and high-performance 154 liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry techniques. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 2011 Jan 30; 300 (1):12-20. Google Scholar
  11. Singh KP, Malik A, Sinha S, Singh VK, Murthy RC. Estimation of source of heavy metal contamination in sediments of Gomti River (India) using principal component analysis. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution. 2005 Sep 1; 166 (1-4):321-41. Google Scholar
  12. Pandey J, Singh R. Heavy metals in sediments of Ganga River: up-and downstream urban influences. Applied Water Science. 2017 Jul 1;7 (4):1669-78. Google Scholar
  13. Varol M, Şen B. Assessment of nutrient and heavy metal contamination in surface water and sediments of the upper Tigris River, Turkey. Catena. 2012 May 1;92:1-0. Google Scholar
  14. Islam MS, Ahmed MK, Raknuzzaman M, Habibullah-Al-Mamun M, Islam MK. Heavy metal pollution in surface water and sediment: a preliminary assessment of an urban river in a developing country. Ecological indicators. 2015 Jan 1; 48:282-91 Google Scholar
  15. Duodu GO, Ogogo KN, Mummullage S, Harden F, Goonetilleke A, Ayoko GA. Source apportionment and risk assessment of PAHs in Brisbane River sediment, Australia. Ecological indicators. 2017 Feb 1; 73:784-99. Google Scholar
  16. Varsha Gupta et.al; “Risk assessment of heavy metal pollution in middle stretch of river Ganga: an introspection”, International Research Journal of Environment Sciences, ISSN 2319– 1414 Vol. 6(2), 62-71, February (2017). Google Scholar
  17. A.K. Bhattacharya, S.N. Mandal, S.K. Das, Heavy metals accumulation in water, sediment and tissues of different edible fishes in upper stretch of Gangetic West Bengal, Trends Appl. Sci. Res. 3 (2008) 61-68 Google Scholar
  18. Agarwal AK, Rajwar GS. Physio-chemical and microbiological study of Tehri dam reservoir, Garhwal Himalaya, India. Journal of American Science. 2010;6 (6):65-71. Google Scholar
  19. Hankin EH. L’action bactéricide des eaux de la Jumna et du Gange sur le vibrion du choléra. Ann Inst Pasteur. 1896; 10:511–23.
  20. Alisky JK, Iczkowski A, Rapoport, Troitsky N. Bacteriophages show promise as antimicrobial agents. J. Infect. 1998; 36:5-15.
  21. Carlton RM. Phage therapy: Past history and future prospects; Arch. Immun. et Ther. 1997; 47: 267- 274.
  22. Borysowski J, Weber-Dabrowska B, Gorski, A. Bacteriophage endolysins as a novel class of antibacterial agents. Exp. Biol. Med (Maywood). 2006; 231: 366-377. 155
  23. Huff WE, Huff GR, Rath NC, Balog JM, Donoghue AM. Alternatives to antibiotics: utilization of bacteriophage to treat colibacillosis and prevent food-borne pathogens. Poul. Sci. 2005; 84:655–659.
  24. 25.Kumar A, Bisht BS, Joshi VD, Singh AK, Talwar A, Physical, Chemical and Bacteriological Study of Water from Rivers of Uttarakhand. Journal of Human Ecology, 32, 2010, 169-173.
  25. 26. Effendi H, Wardiatno Y. Water quality status of Ciambulawung River, Banten Province, based on pollution index and NSF-WQI. Procedia Environmental Sciences. 2015 Jan 1; 24:228-37.
  26. 27.Joshi DM, Bhandari NS, Kumar A, Agrawal N, Statistical analysis of physicochemical parameters of water of river Ganga in Haridwar district. Rasayan Journal of Chemistry, 2, 2009, 579-587.
  27. 28. Matta G. A study on physico-chemical Characteristics to assess the pollution status of river Ganga in Uttarakhand. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2014 Jul;7 (3):210-7.
  28. 29. WHO G. Guidelines for drinking-water quality. World Health Organization. 2011 Apr 16; 216:303-4.)
  29. 30. Haritash AK, Gaur S, Garg S. Assessment of water quality and suitability analysis of River Ganga in Rishikesh, India. Applied Water Science. 2016 Nov;6 (4):383-92.
  30. 31.  Florescu D, Ionete RE, Sandru C, Iordache A, Culea M. The influence of pollution monitoring parameters in characterizing the surface water quality from Romania southern area. Rom. Journ. Phys. 2011 Jan 1; 56(7-8):1001-10.
  31. 32. Mishra A, Tripathi BD, Seasonal and Temporal variations in physico-chemical and bacteriological characteristics of river Ganga in Varanasi. Current World Environment, 2, 2007, 149-154.
  32. 33. Verma A, Current status of physic-chemical characteristics and biological factor of W, Ramganga river in kumaun Himalaya, India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science, 2, 2013, 114-123.
  33. 34. Wilcock RJ, Stevenson CD, Roberts CA. An interlaboratory study of dissolved oxygen in water. Water Research. 1981 Jan 1; 15 (3):321-5.
  34. 35. Aniyikaiye TE, Oluseyi T, Odiyo JO, Edokpayi JN. Physico-chemical analysis of wastewater discharge from selected paint industries in Lagos, Nigeria. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2019 Apr; 16 (7):1235.
  35. 36. Bhateria R, Jain D. Water quality assessment of lake water: a review. Sustainable Water Resources Management. 2016 Jun;2(2):161-73.
  36. 37. Kumar V, Kumar S, Srivastava S, Singh J, Kumar P. Water quality of River Ganga with reference to physico-chemical and microbiological characteristics during Kanwar Mela 2017, at Haridwar, India: A case study. Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science. 2018 Mar 10;3(1):58-63.
  37. 38. Kumar P, Kothari A, Kumar A, Rathi H, Goyal B, Gupta P, Singh B, Mirza AA, Dhingra GK. Evaluation of physicochemical, heavy metal pollution and microbiological indicators in water samples of Ganges at Uttarakhand India: an impact on public health. Int. J. Env. Rehab. Conserv. 2020:445-66.
  38. 39. Khanna DR, Bhutiani R, Matta G, Singh V, Ishaq F. Seasonal variation in physico-chemical characteristic status of River Yamuna in Doon Valley of Uttarakhand. Environment Conservation Journal. 2012;13(1-2):119-24.
  39. 40. Gupta V, Kumar D, Dwivedi A, Vishwakarma U, Malik DS, Paroha S, Mohan N, Gupta N. Heavy metal contamination in river water, sediment, groundwater and human blood, from Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India. Environ Geochem Health. 2022 Jun 8. doi: 10.1007/s10653-022-01290-0. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35674977.
  40. 41. Smolíková V, Brion N, Ma T, Perrot V, Gao Y, Pelcová P, Ridošková A, Leermakers M. A multi methodological evaluation of arsenic in the Zenne River, Belgium: Sources, distribution, geochemistry, and bioavailability. Sci Total Environ. 2022 Dec 10;851(Pt 2):157984. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157984. Epub 2022 Aug 17. PMID: 35987235.
  41. 42. Jolly YN, Rana S, Akter S, Kabir J, Rahman MS, Rahman MM, Sultana MS. Appraisal of metal pollution in the aquatic environment of Shitalakhya River, Bangladesh and its ecological risk assessment. Journal of Nature Science and Sustainable Technology. 2018 Oct 1; 12(4):289-313.
  42. 43. Ahmad MK, Islam S, Rahman S, Haque M, and Islam MM. Heavy metals in water, sediment, and some fishes of Buriganga River, Bangladesh.
  43. 44. Islam MS, Ahmed MK, Raknuzzaman M, Habibullah-Al-Mamun M, Islam MK. Heavy metal pollution in surface water and sediment: a preliminary assessment of an urban river in a developing country. Ecological indicators. 2015 Jan 1;48:282-91.
  44. 45.Ahmad I, Khan B, Khan S, Khan MT, Schwab AP. Assessment of lead exposure among automobile technicians in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Science of the Total Environment. 2018 Aug 15;633:293-9.
  45. 46. Sinha RK, Sinha SK, Kedia DK, Kumari A, Rani N, Sharma G, Prasad K. A holistic study on mercury pollution in the Ganga River system at Varanasi, India. Current Science. 2007 May 10; 92 (9):1223-8.
  46. 47. Saha S, Halder M, Mookerjee S, Palit A. Seasonal influence, enteropathogenic microbial load and diarrhoeal enigma in the Gangetic Delta, India: present scenario and health implications. Journal of infection and public health. 2019 Jul 1;12(4):540-8.
  47. 48. Mishra A, Mukherjee A, Tripathi BD. Seasonal and temporal variations in physico-chemical and bacteriological characteristics of River Ganga in Varanasi 2009.
  48. 218. Adesakin TA, Oyewale AT, Bayero U, Mohammed AN, Aduwo IA, Ahmed PZ, Abubakar ND, Barje IB. Assessment of bacteriological quality and physico-chemical parameters of domestic water sources in Samaru community, Zaria, Northwest Nigeria. Heliyon. 2020 Aug 1;6(8):e04773
  49. 49. Musyoki AM, Abednego M, SULEIMAN MA, MBITHI JN, MAINGI JM. Water-borne bacterial pathogens in surface waters of Nairobi river and health implication tcommunities downstream Athi river.
  50. 50. Pandey PK, Kass PH, Soupir ML, Biswas S, Singh VP. Contamination of water resources by pathogenic bacteria. Amb Express. 2014 Dec;4(1):1-6.
  51. 51. Esharegoma OS, Awujo NC, Jonathan I, Nkonye-asua IP. Microbiological and physicochemical analysis of orogodo river, agbor, delta state, Nigeria. International Journal of Ecological Science and Environmental Engineering. 2018;5(2):34-42.
  52. 52. Juma K, Mburu D, Ngeranwa J, Ouma S. Seasonal variation of the physicochemical and bacteriological quality of water from five rural catchment areas of lake victoria basin in Kenya.
  53. 53. Kothari A, Kumar P, Gaurav A, Kaushal K, Pandey A, Yadav SR, Jain N, Omar BJ. Association of antibiotics and heavy metal arsenic to horizontal gene transfer from multidrug-resistant clinical strains to antibiotic-sensitive environmental strains. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2023 Feb 5;443: 130260.

The Panch Pyayag Ganga River and its headstreams in Uttarakhand, India, hold significant cultural, ecological, and hydrological importance. However, increasing human activity, agricultural runoff, and industrial discharge threaten the river's health, potentially compromising its water quality. This study aims to assess the nutrient and microbial contamination levels in the Ganga River and its individual headstreams with a focus on identifying key pollution sources. Water samples were collected from multiple locations across the river system and analyzed for key parameters: biological oxygen demand, chemical oxygen demand, coliform bacteria, and other microbial indicators of contamination. The results revealed elevated levels of nutrients and microbial contaminants in specific stretches, correlating with nearby urban settlements, agricultural runoffs, and religious activities. The study highlights the need for comprehensive water quality management strategies that address the multi-faceted pollution sources affecting the river ecosystem. Understanding these contamination dynamics is essential for preserving the Ganga River’s ecological integrity and ensuring safe water access for millions of residents and pilgrims in the region.

Keywords : Sustainable Agriculture, Heavy Metals, Microbiological Analysis.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe