Authors : Nwanwa Vivian C.; Okon Aniekan A.; Asuquo, Idongesit O.

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 6 - June

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/dnvxu3re

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25jun567

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : An airfoil is the cross-sectional shape of a wing, blade, or sail, designed to generate aerodynamic forces as it moves through the air. When interacting with airflow, an airfoil generates lift and drag forces. To standardize airfoil design, the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) developed various airfoil families, with extensive studies focused primarily on the 4-digit series. However, limited attention has been given to the aerodynamic behaviour of the 5-digit series. This study assesses the aerodynamic performance of the NACA 23012, a 5-digit airfoil, under varying Reynolds numbers and angles of attack to establish its suitability for high performance wind turbind. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations were conducted at angles of attack (AoA) of 8°, 12°, 16°, 20°, and 24°, with Reynolds numbers of 3.0×106, 6.0×106, and 8.8×106. The objective was to identify the conditions that yield optimal performance in terms of lift-to-drag ratio (L/D), coefficient of lift (CL), and coefficient of drag (CD). Results showed an increase in lift with increasing AoA up to a critical range between 12° and 16°, beyond which flow separation and stall effects reduced aerodynamic efficiency. The optimal performance was observed at an 8° angle of attack and Reynolds number of 8.8×106, where a high lift coefficient and relatively low drag resulted in a favourable lift-to-drag ratio. A linear regression analysis revealed an insignificant variation between CFD results and standard experimental values, validating the simulation accuracy. These findings provide valuable insights for blade design aimed at enhancing aerodynamic efficiency in wind turbines, ultimately improving torque generation, power output, and overall system performance.

Keywords : NACA 23012 Airfoil; Angle of Attack; Reynolds Number; Lift-to-Drag Ratio; Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD).

References :

1. Yoro, K. O., & Daramola, M. O. (2020). CO2 emission sources, greenhouse gases, and the global warming effect. In Advances in carbon capture (pp. 3-28). Woodhead Publishing.
2. Siddik, M., Islam, M., Zaman, A. K. M. M., & Hasan, M. (2021). Current status and correlation of fossil fuels consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Int. J. Energy Environ. Econ, 28, 103-119.
3. Dahlan, N. Y., Ahmad, N., Ilham, N. I., & Yusoff, S. H. (2022). Energy security: role of renewable and low-carbon technologies. In Handbook of energy and environmental security (pp. 39-60). Academic Press.
4. Izanloo, M., Noorollahi, Y., & Aslani, A. (2021). Future energy planning to maximize renewable energy share for the south Caspian Sea climate. Renewable Energy, 175, 660-675.
5. Eltayeb, W. A., Somlal, J., Kumar, S., & Rao, S. K. (2023). Design and analysis of a solar-wind hybrid renewable energy tree. Results in Engineering, 17, 100958.
6. Mostafaeipour, A., Rezaei, M., Jahangiri, M., & Qolipour, M. (2020). Feasibility analysis of a new tree-shaped wind turbine for urban application: A case study. Energy & Environment, 31(7), 1230-1256.
7. Jha, A. R. (2010). Wind turbine technology. Boca Raton, Florida, USA: CRC Press.
8. Miliket, T. A., Ageze, M. B., & Tigabu, M. T. (2022). Aerodynamic performance enhancement and computational methods for H-Darrieus vertical axis wind turbines. International Journal of Green Energy, 19(13), 1428-1465.
9. Silva, M. F., Malheiro, B., Guedes, P., & Ferreira, P. (2020). Airfoil selection and wingsail design for an autonomous sailboat. In Robot 2019: Fourth Iberian Robotics Conference: Advances in Robotics, Volume 1 (pp. 305-316). Springer International Publishing.
10. Anderson, J. D. (2010). Fundamentals of Aerodynamics (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
11. Abbott, I. H., & Von Doenhoff, A. E. (1959). Theory of Wing Sections: Including a Summary of Airfoil Data. Dover Publications.
12. Karamcheti, K. (1980). Principles of Ideal-Fluid Aerodynamics. Krieger Publishing Company.
13. Seifi Davari, H., Seify Davari, M., Botez, R., & Chowdhury, H. (2023). Maximizing the peak lift-to-drag coefficient ratio of airfoils by optimizing the ratio of thickness to the camber of airfoils. Sustainable Earth Trends, 3(4), 46-61.
14. Rizwan, M., Yousuf, F., & Khan, M. S. (2017). CFD Analysis of NACA 0012 for Wind Turbine Blades. International Journal of Mechanical and Production Engineering, 5(5), 100–104.
15. Ahmed, N., & Ismail, M. (2014). CFD Simulation for Airfoil NACA 4412. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, 15(2), 61–66.
16. Subhodh S Ghadge1 , Nandakishor H Murhekar2 , Amol L Khatode (2021). CFD Analysis carried out on Wind Turbine Blade for Different Angles of Attack and Various Reynolds Number. © 2021 IJCRT | Volume 9, Issue 1 January 2021 | ISSN: 2320-2882.
17. Khalid, M. H. (2022). CFD Analysis of NACA 0012 Aerofoil to Investigate the Effect of Increasing Angle of Attack on Coefficient of Lift and Coefficient of Drag. Journal of Studies in Science and Engineering, 2(1), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.53898/josse2022216.
18. Tullis, S., et al. (2011). "Modelling and testing of modified helical vertical-axis wind turbines." Wind Engineering, 35(3), 361–376.
19. Rezaeiha, A., Montazeri, H., & Blocken, B. (2017). "Towards optimal aerodynamic design of vertical axis wind turbines: Impact of solidity and number of blades." Energy Conversion and Management, 153, 362–377.
20. Airfoil Tool database (2025). http://airfoiltools.com/airfoil/details?airfoil=naca23012-il    Accessed April 25, 2025.
21. Julius, M. O., Adio, S., Soji-Adekunle, A., Ishaq, A., Akigbade, T., & Fatai, B. (2025). Unsteady aerodynamic performance of spiked and unspiked aloe vera-inspired aerofoils at low reynolds number. LAUTECH Journal of Engineering and Technology, 19(1), 54-64.
22. Semprini Cesari, G. (2023). Active flow control of the turbulent boundary layer over a NACA4412 wing profile for skin friction drag reduction.
23. Jo, B. W., & Majid, T. (2022). Aerodynamic analysis of camber morphing airfoils in transition via computational fluid dynamics. Biomimetics, 7(2), 52.
24. Versteeg H. K. and W. Malalasekera (2007). Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Finite Volume Method. 2nd Eddition. Pearson Education Limited. ISBN 9780131274983.
25. McCroskey, W. J. (1987). The Phenomenon of Stall. NASA Technical Memorandum 86890.
26. Schlichting, H., & Gersten, K. (2016). Boundary-Layer Theory (9th ed.). Springer
27. Menter, F. R. (1994). Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal, 32(8), 1598–1605. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149.