Authors : Aminu Dauda; Anas Shehu

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 3 - March

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/67a7k3ce

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/2s4x3ybr

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25mar832

Google Scholar

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 15 to 20 days to display the article.

Abstract : The Internet of Things (IoT) has emerged as a transformative technology, connecting physical devices to digital networks for seamless communication, monitoring, and analysis. This study explores the feasibility, benefits, and challenges of IoT adoption at Waziri Umaru Federal Polytechnic Birnin Kebbi, based on data collected from students, academic staff, non-academic staff, and management. A questionnaire-based research design was employed, with 114 respondents providing insights into IoT awareness, perception, and implementation barriers. Findings reveal that 76% of respondents are familiar with IoT, and 94.7% recognize its potential to enhance institutional efficiency, security, and resource management. However, financial constraints, lack of awareness, technical expertise, and security concerns pose significant challenges to IoT deployment. Despite these barriers, 60.5% of respondents expressed willingness to participate in IoT-related training programs, suggesting a strong foundation for future adoption. The study highlights the need for structured policies, investment in digital infrastructure, and targeted educational initiatives to facilitate IoT implementation in higher education institutions.

Keywords : Internet of Things (IoT), Institutional Adoption, Awareness, Perception, Feasibility, Challenges.

References :

1. R. M. Akbar, and A. Embong, “Technology Based Learning Systems in Internet of Things (IoT) Education ” in 7th International Conference on Computer and Communication Engineering (ICCCE), 2018, pp. 192 - 197.
2. I. S. M. Agarwal, and J. A. Obaid, “Block chain and IoT Strategy in Transformation of Education Sector,” International Journal of Education, vol. 17, no. 1, 2021.
3. A. V. Deursen, Z. A. Vander, P. DeBoer, G. Jensen, and R. T. Van, “Digital Inequalities in the Internet of Things: Differences in Attitude, Material Access, Skills, and Usage.,,” information, communication and society, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 258-276, 2021.
4. S. P. Mathews, and R. R. Gondkar, “Solution Integration Approach Using IoT in Education System,” International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 44-49, 2017.
5. N. Letting, and J. Mukikya, “Internet of Things (IoT) and Quality of Higher Education in Kenya,” international Journal of Management and Leadership Studies, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 14-26, 2020.
6. V. Shrinath, S. Shivani, and Shruti, “IoT Applications in Education,” International Journal of Advance Research and Debelopment., vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 20-24, 2017.
7. H. Aldoweb, R. G. Shafiqul, and I. Umar, “Internet of Things in Higher Education: A Case Study on Future Learning,” ICCSCM Journal of Physics, pp. 1-10, 2017.
8. R. Chwega, M. Samuel-soma, A. Buba, and M. Samuel, “IoT and Big Data Technologies: Opportunities and Challenges For Higher Learning ” International journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 909-913, 2020.
9. D. Sivakumar, M. Jusman, and M. A. Mohd, “A Case Study Review: Future of Internet of Things (IoT) in Malaysia,” in in International Conference Proceedings-- Information Systems and Engineering, 2017, pp. 1-10.
10. M. Kaur, and P. Maheshwari, “Building Smart Cities Applications Using IoT and Cloud-based Architectures,” IEEE, pp. 1-5, 2016.
11. A. Rayes, and S. Salam, “Internet of Things from hype to reality: The road to digitization. ,” Springer, pp. 1-35, 2019.