⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



Analyzing the Impact of Artificial Beach Nourishment on Shoreline Dynamics: A Case Study of Calido Beach - Kaluthara


Authors : Pubudu Karunarathna

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 4 - April


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/4tjhj6nh

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/muxn4dn8

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26apr128

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : Sandy beaches face a significant threat due to coastal erosion worldwide. Artificial beach nourishment has become an emerging approach to overcoming this threat. However, empirical assessments of nourishment effectiveness, particularly in data scarce regions, are essential for evidence based coastal management. This study assesses the impact of the artificial beach nourishment conducted in 2017 to 2020 in the Calido Beach area of Kalutara, Sri Lanka, in mitigating shoreline erosion. A multi decadal shoreline change analysis was conducted using Landsat 5, 7, and 8 imagery (1992 - 2017) and Sentinel 2 imagery (2021 -2024). The Modified Normalized Difference Water Index (MNDWI) was used for shoreline extraction and shoreline change rates were calculated using the Digital Shoreline Analysis System (DSAS). Results indicate a marked transformation in shoreline behavior following nourishment. Pre nourishment, 36.65% of transects exhibited erosion with an average End Point Rate (EPR) of -1.18 m/yr, while 63.35% showed accretion averaging 2.21 m/yr. Post nourishment, erosional transects declined to just 9.77% (average -0.89 m/yr), while accretional transects increased to 90.23% (average 6.74 m/yr). The overall average EPR increased from 0.96 ± 0.07 m/yr to 6.00 ± 2.83 m/yr, and the Shoreline Change Envelope (SCE) decreased from 60.10 m to 20.87 m, indicating enhanced shoreline stability. The findings demonstrate that the artificial beach nourishment at Calido Beach has been highly effective in reversing historical erosion trends and promoting sustained accretion. This study provides critical empirical evidence for coastal managers in Sri Lanka and the broader South Asian region, highlighting the utility of remote sensing and DSAS based monitoring for evaluating coastal interventions. Long term monitoring is recommended to assess nourishment longevity and inform adaptive management strategies.

Keywords : Artificial Beach Nourishment, Shoreline Change, DSAS, MNDWI, Coastal Erosion

References :

  1. Bird, E.C.F. (2008). Coastal Geomorphology: An Introduction. John Wiley & Sons.
  2. Campbell, T.J., & Benedet, L. (2006). Beach nourishment magnitudes and project performance. Shore & Beach, 74(1), 17–24.
  3. Cooke, B.C., Jones, A.R., Goodwin, I.D., & Bishop, M.J. (2020). Nourishment practices on Australian sandy beaches: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 254, 109808.
  4. Dean, R.G. (2002). Beach Nourishment: Theory and Practice. World Scientific.
  5. Dean, R.G., & Houston, J.R. (2016). Determining shoreline response to beach nourishment. Journal of Coastal Research, 32(3), 517–529.
  6. Defeo, O., McLachlan, A., Schoeman, D.S., et al. (2009). Threats to sandy beach ecosystems: A review. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 81(1), 1–12.
  7. Elko, N., Briggs, T.R., Benedet, L., et al. (2021). A decade of beach nourishment in the USA: A review. Shore & Beach, 89(1), 3–22.
  8. Fernando, S., & Dissanayake, S. (2021). Coastal tourism and erosion management in Sri Lanka. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 25(3), 1–14.
  9. Finkl, C.W., & Walker, H.J. (2004). Beach nourishment. In Encyclopedia of Coastal Science (pp. 127–131). Springer.
  10. Hanson, H., Brampton, A., Capobianco, M., et al. (2002). Beach nourishment projects, practices, and objectives—a European overview. Coastal Engineering, 47(2), 81–111.
  11. Houston, J.R. (2008). The economic value of beach nourishment. Shore & Beach, 76(3), 10–15.
  12. Luijendijk, A., Hagenaars, G., Ranasinghe, R., et al. (2018). The state of the world's beaches. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 6641.
  13. Mentaschi, L., Vousdoukas, M.I., Pekel, J.F., et al. (2018). Global long-term observations of coastal erosion and accretion. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 12876.
  14. Pilkey, O.H., & Dixon, K.L. (1996). The Corps and the Shore. Island Press.
  15. Ranasinghe, R. (2016). Assessing climate change impacts on open sandy coasts: A review. Earth-Science Reviews, 160, 320–332.
  16. Ratnayake, A.S., & Samarakoon, S. (2018). Coastal erosion and management in Sri Lanka: A review. Journal of Coastal Research, 34(5), 1123–1132.
  17. Ratnayake, A.S., Samarakoon, S., & Ratnayake, N.P. (2019). Coastal geomorphology and sediment dynamics in southwestern Sri Lanka. Ocean & Coastal Management, 178, 104816.
  18. Schlacher, T.A., Dugan, J., Schoeman, D.S., et al. (2007). Sandy beaches at the brink. Diversity and Distributions, 13(5), 556–560.
  19. Small, C., & Nicholls, R.J. (2003). A global analysis of human settlement in coastal zones. Journal of Coastal Research, 19(3), 584–599.
  20. SLTDA (2023). Annual Statistical Report 2022. Sri Lanka Tourism Development Authority.
  21. Stive, M.J., de Schipper, M.A., Luijendijk, A.P., et al. (2013). The Sand Motor: A nature-based response to climate change. Journal of Coastal Research, 65(sp2), 1463–1468.
  22. Vousdoukas, M.I., Ranasinghe, R., Mentaschi, L., et al. (2020). Sandy coastlines under threat of erosion. Nature Climate Change, 10(3), 260–263.
  23. Amarasinghe, A. (2020). Intensity of coastal erosion in Sri Lanka: The case of south western coastal sector. American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Development, 2(11), 01–07.
  24. Dean, R.G., & Houston, J.R. (2016). Determining shoreline response to beach nourishment. Journal of Coastal Research, 32(3), 517–529.
  25. Gracia, A., Rangel-Buitrago, N., Oakley, J.A., & Williams, A.T. (2018). Use of ecosystems in coastal erosion management. Ocean and Coastal Management, 156, 277–289.
  26. Hanson, H., Brampton, A., Capobianco, M., et al. (2002). Beach nourishment projects, practices, and objectives—a European overview. Coastal Engineering, 47(2), 81–111.
  27. Jayasinghe, H.G.H., Samarakoon, S.M.N.M., Mohomad, H.H., Ratnayake, N.P., Abeysinghe, A.M.K.B., & Dushyantha, N.P. (2020). Mineralogical exploration for rare earth element potential in Kalutara coastal areas. Proceedings of ISERME 2020.
  28. Kirishanthan, P. (2022). Physical and social vulnerability to coastal erosion: An assessment of Kalutara Coastal Belt, Sri Lanka. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1109(1), 012077.
  29. Kuang, C., Chen, L., Han, X., Wang, D., Cao, D., & Zou, Q. (2024). Impacts of an artificial sandbar on wave transformation and runup over a nourished beach. Geosciences, 14(12), 337.
  30. Kumar, P., Debele, S.E., Sahani, J., et al. (2021). An overview of monitoring methods for assessing the performance of nature-based solutions against natural hazards. Earth-Science Reviews, 217, 103603.
  31. Lakshitha, N.V.D., Samarasekara, R.S.M., & Siriwardana, H.P.A.M. (2025). Optimizing beach nourishment composition for coastal protection in Sri Lanka: Insights from flume experiments. Environmental Science [Preprint].
  32. Lin, L., & Pussella, P. (2017). Assessment of vulnerability for coastal erosion with GIS and AHP techniques case study: Southern coastline of Sri Lanka. Natural Resource Modeling, 30(4), e12146.
  33. Mohan, B. (2020). Did Mount Beach need restoration? Colombo Gazette, 29 April 2020.
  34. Samadhini, J.A.C.D., & Herath, H.M.K.C.W. (2024). Evaluating the impact of coastal erosion and human activities on the sustainability of Kalutara Calido Beach, Sri Lanka. ICAPS 2024 Proceedings.
  35. Samarasekara, R.S.M., Sasaki, J., Jayaratne, R., Suzuki, T., Ranawaka, R.A.S., & Pathmasiri, S.D. (2018). Historical changes in the shoreline and management of Marawila Beach, Sri Lanka, from 1980 to 2017. Ocean & Coastal Management, 165, 370–384.
  36. Sandamali, K.U.J., & Abeykoon, A.M.S.N. (2020). Remote sensing monitoring of recent morphodynamics in Kalido beach, Kalutara, Sri Lanka. Department of Oceanography and Marine Geology, University of Ruhuna.
  37. Thennakoon, T.M.P.D.U.B., Fernando, W.S.M., Randika, R.M.T., Abinash, R., & Weerasinghe, V.P.A. (2024). Assessment of coastal land area changes at Calido beach, Kalutara, using remote sensing and GIS techniques. ICAPS 2024 Proceedings.
  38. Weerasekara, O.N., & Illeperuma, I.A.K.S. (2024). Shoreline change detection and future prediction for southwestern coastline, Sri Lanka. Original Article.

Sandy beaches face a significant threat due to coastal erosion worldwide. Artificial beach nourishment has become an emerging approach to overcoming this threat. However, empirical assessments of nourishment effectiveness, particularly in data scarce regions, are essential for evidence based coastal management. This study assesses the impact of the artificial beach nourishment conducted in 2017 to 2020 in the Calido Beach area of Kalutara, Sri Lanka, in mitigating shoreline erosion. A multi decadal shoreline change analysis was conducted using Landsat 5, 7, and 8 imagery (1992 - 2017) and Sentinel 2 imagery (2021 -2024). The Modified Normalized Difference Water Index (MNDWI) was used for shoreline extraction and shoreline change rates were calculated using the Digital Shoreline Analysis System (DSAS). Results indicate a marked transformation in shoreline behavior following nourishment. Pre nourishment, 36.65% of transects exhibited erosion with an average End Point Rate (EPR) of -1.18 m/yr, while 63.35% showed accretion averaging 2.21 m/yr. Post nourishment, erosional transects declined to just 9.77% (average -0.89 m/yr), while accretional transects increased to 90.23% (average 6.74 m/yr). The overall average EPR increased from 0.96 ± 0.07 m/yr to 6.00 ± 2.83 m/yr, and the Shoreline Change Envelope (SCE) decreased from 60.10 m to 20.87 m, indicating enhanced shoreline stability. The findings demonstrate that the artificial beach nourishment at Calido Beach has been highly effective in reversing historical erosion trends and promoting sustained accretion. This study provides critical empirical evidence for coastal managers in Sri Lanka and the broader South Asian region, highlighting the utility of remote sensing and DSAS based monitoring for evaluating coastal interventions. Long term monitoring is recommended to assess nourishment longevity and inform adaptive management strategies.

Keywords : Artificial Beach Nourishment, Shoreline Change, DSAS, MNDWI, Coastal Erosion

Paper Submission Last Date
30 - April - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe