Authors : Rachmat Rinaldi; Dewi Nursaningrum

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 8 - August

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/ej9yuydh

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/3cpkupvc

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24AUG1480

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : Selecting the right vendor for the Cash Recycle Machine (CRM) is a key factor for the sustainability of PT X in the banking business, as most banking tasks are carried out by vendors. Therefore, the vendor selection process is one of the main and crucial processes. This research aims to determine the weight of criteria, and sub-criteria, and analyze the best vendor selection for the Cash Recycle Machine Implementation Project at PT X using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. The number of respondents in this study was eight, consisting of the Project Director, Project Manager, and Division Heads who are the decision-makers in vendor selection. The research was conducted through structured interviews using Saaty’s scale comparison questionnaires for criteria selection and rating scale assessment for vendor evaluation. The criteria evaluated based on the Vendor Performance Indicator (VPI) are Quality, Cost, Delivery, Flexibility, and Responsiveness, with the most influential sub-criteria being Price Reduction, Product Reliability, and Demand Adjustment. The selected vendor for the Cash Recycle Machine implementation project is PT ZZZ with a score of 40% out of 100%, followed by PT YYY with a score of 32%, and PT XXX with a score of 28%.

Keywords : Component; AHP, Vendor Selection, VPI, Cash Recycle Machine

References :

1. de Oliveira, R. A. F., Lopes, J., & Abreu, M. I. (2021). Insights from a project procurement strategy through action research. Procedia Computer Science, 181, 1002–1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.275
2. Handajani, L., Muhsyaf, S. A., & Sokarina, A. (2023). The Effectiveness of Corporate Governance and Whistleblowing System on Fraud Disclosure. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 18(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.24843/jiab.2023.v18.i01.p03
3. Lysons, K., & Farrington, B. (2016). Procurement and Supply Chain Management (Ninth Edition). Pearson. www.pearson.com/uk
4. Min, S., Zacharia, Z. G., & Smith, C. D. (2019). Defining Supply Chain Management: In the Past, Present, and Future. Journal of Business Logistics, 40(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12201
5. Nugroho, R. E., & Iskandar, M. S. (2020). Application of AHP for Supplier Selection in Construction Companies. Saudi Journal of Engineering and Technology, 05(04), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.36348/sjet.2020.v05i04.008
6. Nusraningrum, D., Jaswati, J., & Thamrin, H. (2020). THE QUALITY OF IT PROJECT MANAGEMENT: THE BUSINESS PROCESS AND THE GO PROJECT LEAN APPLICATION. Manajemen Bisnis, 10(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.22219/jmb.v10i1.10808
7. Putri, C. G., & Nusraningrum, D. (2022). Subcontractors Selection of Building Construction Project Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Others Reference by Similarity (TOPSIS) Methods. Jurnal Manajemen Teori Dan Terapan | Journal of Theory and Applied Management, 15(2), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.20473/jmtt.v15i2.35915
8. Saaty, R. W. (1987). THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS-WHAT IT IS AND HOW IT IS USED (Vol. 9, Issue 5).
9. Herdiana, D. (2019). Determining the Best Location of Cash Recycle Machine using Simple Additive Weighting Method. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 662(6). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/662/6/062010
10. Safarida, N., Fahriansah, & Zikrillah, N. (2022). Customer preference analysis in using cash recycle machine service at Bank Syariah Indonesia. J-EBIS (Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam). https://doi.org/10.32505/j-ebis.v7i1.4061
11. Russo, R. D. F. S. M., & Camanho, R. (2015). Criteria in AHP: A systematic review of literature. Procedia Computer Science, 55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.081
12. Suartini, N. K. Y., Divayana, D. G. H., & Dewi, L. J. E. (2023). Comparison Analysis of AHP-SAW, AHP-WP, AHP-TOPSIS Methods in Private Tutor Selection. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2023.01.03
13. Wulandari, K. S., Widaningrum, S., & Salma, S. A. (2023). Implementing AHP Method for Determining Level Priority of Vendor Selection. International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System, 7(02). https://doi.org/10.25124/ijies.v7i02.240.
14. Li, C. C., Fun, Y. P., & Hung, J. S. (1997). A new measure for supplier performance evaluation. IIE Transactions (Institute of Industrial Engineers), 29(9). https://doi.org/10.1080/07408179708966385
15. Firdaus, A., Mulyati, E., & Permadi, D. (2023). Analisis Pemilihan Vendor Trucking Menggunakan Metode Ahp dan Topsis pada PT. LK. INNOVATIVE: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(6).
16. Suroto, K., & Hasbullah, H. (2023). Selection lead logistics provider in consumer goods using AHP – TOPSIS approach. Sinergi (Indonesia), 27(2). https://doi.org/10.22441/sinergi.2023.2.006
17. Al Khoiry, I., Gernowo, R., & Surarso, B. (2022). Fuzzy-ahp moora approach for vendor selection applications. Register: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Sistem Informasi, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.26594/REGISTER.V8I1.2356