Authors : Muhamad Yazid Bustomi; Agung Enggal Nugroho; Sugeng Raharjo; Faizal; Naufal Fadhil; Wawan Setiawan; Ricky Santana

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 7 - July

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3mctjbbx

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/ym2cyaed

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUL236

Abstract : UKM Tangguh is a collaborative entrepreneurship education program. The program consists of required entrepreneurship material and is adapted to current developments for entrepreneurs in various business fields as participants. Economically, the UKM Tangguh program has contributed to the number of MSMEs upgrading, as seen from changes in the composition of the business scale. Socially, the UKM Tangguh program has helped change the mindset of participants from being a trader to being business person. The objectives of this research are (1) to determine the impact of the program through the social return on investment (SROI) approach and (2) to analyze the level of community satisfaction with the program. The data analysis method uses a comparison of SROI values and the community satisfaction index. Respondents in this study were all participants who were members of the UKM Tangguh program and were willing to take part in each activity session provided. The research results show that the SROI value of the UKM Tangguh program is 21.49, which means that every rupiah of investment given by the company to this program can provide added value, reaching 21.49 times. The assessment of the UKM Tangguh program from the beneficiaries received a very good rating with a score of 3.28 on a scale of 4, if converted to a scale of 100 with a score of 82.04 in the very satisfied category. The high level of beneficiary satisfaction shows the success of implementing the program.

Keywords : Corporate Social Responsibility, Social Return On Investment, Satisfaction Index.

References :

1. Aditya, R., & Widhagdha, M. F. (2020). Social Return on Investment (SROI) Konsep dan Praktik Evaluasi Dampak Investasi Sosial. Arjuna Wijaya Karya.
2. Ainuddin, I., Hadi, S. P., Suryoko, S., Purnomo, A., & Ihsanto, M. (2021). Measuring the Effectiveness of Community Development through Social Return on Investment (SROI) Method: Case Study of PT Bukit Asam Pelabuhan Tarahan, Lampung, Indonesia. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Social and Political Enquiries, ICISPE 2021. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.14-9-2021.2321395
3. Anam, A. K., Arifin, M., Mahaputra, W., & Agus Prasetiyo, R. (2022). Analysis of Social Return on Investment (SROI) on Social Innovation of Superman Sumanding. Journal of Management and Entrepreneurship Research, 3(2), 88–105. https://doi.org/10.34001/jmer.2022.12.03.2-30
4. Ananda, F. H., & Nofadila, T. (2023). Dampak Program Csr Pendidikan Anak Sad (Suku Anak Dalam) Binaan Pt Pertamina Hulu Energi Jambi Merang: Analisis Social Return …. Learning Society: Jurnal CSR, Pendidikan Dan …, 4(1), 206–214.
5. Aryanto, D., Rohaeni, N., & Fadhil, N. (2022). Measurement of Wakarorosku Natural Program Implementation Impact PT. KPC with Social Return on Investment Approach. International Journal Of Social Service And Research, 2(11), 1118–1128.
6. Bustomi, M. Y., Rohaeni, N., Aryanto, D., & Faizal, F. (2021). Pengaruh Pemanfaatan Aplikasi Digital Terhadap Pemberdayaan UMKM di Kabupaten Kutai Timur. Widya Cipta: Jurnal Sekretari Dan Manajemen, 5(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.31294/widyacipta.v5i1.9300
7. Dharmacahya, B., Padmaningrum, D., & Wibowo, A. (2022). Implementasi Program Corporate Social Responsibility PT. Pertamina Terhadap Pemulihan Bisnis UMKM Binaan Akibat Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal KIRANA, 3(1), 13–32. https://doi.org/10.19184/jkrn.v3i1.29082
8. Fakhrudin, R., & Susetyo, Y. A. (2021). Penilaian Dampak Investasi Sosial Program Budidaya Tanaman Hidroponik PT. Pertamina (Persero) Fuel Terminal Tanjung Gerem. Empower: Jurnal Pengembangan Masyarakat Islam, 6(2), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.24235/empower.v6i2.8981
9. Muawanah, U., & Hayati, N. (2019). Analisis Corporate Social Responsibility dan Nilai Perusahaan: Dampak Variabel Kontekstual. Akuntabilitas: Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi, 12(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.15408/akt.v12i1.12656
10. Novita, N., & Iriani, F. (2018). Dampak Pelaksanaan Program Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) PT. Holcim Indonesia, Tbk Terhadap Masyarakat Lokal di Kabupaten Cilacap. Jurnal Kesejahteraan Sosial, 3(01), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.31326/jks.v3i01.167
11. Noviyanto, I. A., & Simammora, L. (2023). Dampak Keberhasilan Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) PT. Astra Internasional Terhadap Kesejahteraan Masyarakat. Jurnal Agribisains, 9(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.30997/jagi.v9i1.6347
12. Nurjanah, Salam, N. E., & Awza, R. (2013). Pengelolaan Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Dalam Pengelolaan Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Dalam Membangun Citra Perusahaan. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 2(2), 73–82.
13. Wijaya, O., Susanto, D. A., Rozaki, Z., & Nurhidayati, A. P. (2021). Dampak Investasi Sosial Pelaksanaan Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Terhadap Pengembangan Agribisnis Jamur Dengan Pendekatan Social Return On Investment (SROI). Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis (JEPA), 5(4), 1270–1279.
14. Zainal, R. I. (2019). Analisis Nilai Manfaat Ekonomi Program CSR dan PKBL PT. Analisis Nilai Manfaat Ekonomi Program CSR dan PKBL PT. Bukit Asam (Tbk.). Mbia, 17(3), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.33557/mbia.v17i3.266