Analysis of Risk Factors on Implementation Performance Building Work in Palu City


Authors : Nirmalawati; Tutang Muhtar; Andi Asnudin

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 3 - March


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/382vaunv

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/4pdzzy4b

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25mar118

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : A comprehensive study was conducted to determine the risk factors significantly impacting Palu City's building construction performance. A descriptive method was used, and 47 stakeholders involved in building implementation, including civil engineers, local government officials, and construction industry stakeholders, were surveyed. Multiple linear regression was used for data analysis. The results showed that four factors, namely management, finance, material, and labor, significantly influenced building work implementation. These factors are significant as they provide insights into the key areas that need attention in the construction industry in Palu City. Two regression equations showed the association between the factors and performance. According to the coefficient of determination test, 77% and 84% of the performance variability could be explained by the components found. This shows a strong relationship between these factors and the construction performance of building projects. In comparison, the remaining 23% and 16% were attributed to other factors not identified in the study. These findings suggest that the construction industry in Palu City needs to consider and manage the identified risk factors to improve the overall building construction project performance.

Keywords : Factor; Risk; Performance; Building; Palu

References :

  1. F. and L. E. W. Gray, Project Management, The     Managerial Process 3rd Edition,Yogyakarta: Andi  Offset., 2006.
  2. I.W.Ervianto, Construction Project Management. Yogjakarta: ANDI, 2005.
  3. H. Kerzner, "Project Management, A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling and Controlling., Seven Edition," vol. I. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2001.
  4. Bambang Pujiyono, Project Management Concepts. Project Management, 2008.
  5. M.Mahsun, Public Sector Performance Measurement. Yogyakarta, 2009.
  6. M.Hasibuan, Human Resource Management. Jakarta: Gunung Agung Store, 2016.
  7. M. P. Tika, Organizational Culture and Company Performance Improvement. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara, 2005
  8. H.Nurlela.Suprapto, "Identification and Risk Management Analysis on Infrastructure Development Storey Building Project," Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning. Jakarta: West Java, 2014.
  9. R. and N.G. Flanagan, Risk Management and Constructions. England: Blackwell Science Ltd. Oxford, 1993.
  10. P., H.W.S.,&P.L. Godfrey, "Control of Risk A Guide to Systematic Management of Risk from Construction," Construction Industry Research and Information Association (CIRIA)., 1996.
  11. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, " Risk assessment of Construction Project," Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 33–46, Jan. 2010.
  12. M. Knemeyer, "Proactive Planning For Catastrophic Events In Supply Chains," Journal of Operations Management, vol. 27, pp. 141–153, 2009.
  13. Nadya Safira Asmarantaka,"Analysis of Risks Affecting Project Performance in the Construction of Batiqa Palembang," Journal of Engineering and Environment, vol. 2, no. 3, Sep. 2014.
  14. Iman. Soeharto, Project Management (From Conceptual to Operational,vol. II. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2001.
  15. Kurniawan B," Construction Risk Analysis on Petra Square Surabaya Apartment Construction Project," Surabaya: ITS, 2011.
  16. S. Arikunto, Research Management. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta., 2003.
  17. F. Nugrahani, Qualitative Research Methods in Language Education Research, vol. 2. Surakarta: 2014.
  18. A. Suharsimi, Research procedure.  Jakarta: Rineka Cipta,  2010.
  19. Ridwan, Introduction to Statistics for Research. Bandung: Alfabeta Bandung, 2013.
  20. Sugiyono, Statistics for Research. Bandung:Alfabeta, 2010
  21. A.N.C.D.W.A.M.Thressia. 2 Ardy, “Identification of  Construction  Safety Management System Risk and Control with Job Safety Analysis  Method (Case Study of The Santika Premiere Padang Hotel Development  Project),"Journal Of Applied Engineering Scienties, vol. 4, no. 1, Jan. 2021.
  22. H. Alexander et al., " Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Study Beam Construction in Building Construction,"Jurnal Ilmiah Poli Rekayasa, vol.15, no 1,2019.
  23. R.G. Sudarmanto, Multiple Linier Regression Analysis with SPSS. Yogjakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2005.
  24. Alfahad Ali,  Burhan  Abbas, "BIM-Supporting System  by Integrating Risk Management and Value              Management, " Engineering, Technology & Applied  Science Research., vol. 13, No. 6, 12130-           12137.12130.  https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr, 2023.
  25. Rana Jabbar Kasid Jalhoom, Ahmed Mohammed Raoof       Raoof Mahjoob.,"An MCDM Approach for Evaluating Construction-Related Risks Using a Combined Fuzzy Grey DEMATEL Method," Engineering Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 14, No. 2, 2024, 13572-13577.13572. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.

A comprehensive study was conducted to determine the risk factors significantly impacting Palu City's building construction performance. A descriptive method was used, and 47 stakeholders involved in building implementation, including civil engineers, local government officials, and construction industry stakeholders, were surveyed. Multiple linear regression was used for data analysis. The results showed that four factors, namely management, finance, material, and labor, significantly influenced building work implementation. These factors are significant as they provide insights into the key areas that need attention in the construction industry in Palu City. Two regression equations showed the association between the factors and performance. According to the coefficient of determination test, 77% and 84% of the performance variability could be explained by the components found. This shows a strong relationship between these factors and the construction performance of building projects. In comparison, the remaining 23% and 16% were attributed to other factors not identified in the study. These findings suggest that the construction industry in Palu City needs to consider and manage the identified risk factors to improve the overall building construction project performance.

Keywords : Factor; Risk; Performance; Building; Palu

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe