Analysis of Components for BPR Implementation in the Public Sector, Focusing on Online Service Delivery in Tanzania


Authors : Jamili Rajabu Chewe; Dr Nima Shidende; Dr. Jabhera Matogoro

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 2 - February


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2s4x9ea2

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/2cu34tbz

DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14937074


Abstract : This study analyzes critical components for successful Business Process Reengineering (BPR) implementation to enhance online public service delivery in Tanzania. BPR aims to rethink and redesign organizational processes to improve performance metrics such as cost, quality, service, and speed. In Tanzania's public sector, BPR is essential for addressing bureaucratic inefficiencies, inadequate infrastructure, and skill gaps that hinder effective service delivery. Key findings emphasize the importance of stakeholder engagement, leadership commitment, organizational readiness, citizen-centric approaches, information technology, change management, and legal reform. These elements ensure that reengineered processes align with organizational goals and citizen needs. Leadership drives change, while technology integration enhances efficiency. Stakeholder involvement and readiness are crucial for adapting to new systems. The study also identifies gaps in Tanzania's online service delivery, including limited ICT infrastructure, resistance to change, and low digital literacy. These challenges undermine the potential of online services but can be addressed by implementing the identified components, leading to more effective and citizen-centric services. By developing a comprehensive BPR framework, this study guides public administrators in navigating process transformation, ensuring improved service quality and citizen satisfaction in Tanzania's public sector.

Keywords : Business Process Re-engineering, Online Service Delivery, Public Sector, Digital Transformation, Stakeholder Engagement, Tanzania, Public Service Delivery, Business Process, Process Improvement, Information and Communication Technology, Process Mapping.

References :

  1. Alghamdi, A., Goodwin, R., & Rampersad, G. (2011). E-Government readiness assessment framework. Government Information Quarterly, 28(1), 14-20.
  2. Arendt, L. A., Priem, R. L., & Ndofor, H. A. (1995). A CEO-adviser model of strategic decision making. Journal of Management, 21(5), 833-847.
  3. Attaran, M. (2003). Information technology and business-process redesign. Business Process Management Journal, 9(4), 440-458.
  4. Bayomy, A., Mukherjee, A., & Heeks, R. (2021). Challenges in ICT implementation for public service delivery. The International Journal of Digital Transformation, 12(3), 45-60.
  5. Bedi, A., Alpaslan, C. M., & Green, S. (2016). A meta-analytic review of ethical leadership outcomes and moderators. Journal of Business Ethics, 139, 517-536.
  6. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  7. Davenport, T. H., & Short, J. E. (1990). The new industrial engineering: Information technology and business process redesign. Sloan Management Review, 31(4), 11-27.
  8. Elshaer, I. A., & Augustyn, M. M. (2016). Direct effects of quality management on competitive advantage. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 33(9), 1286-1310.
  9. Freeman, R. E. (1999). Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of management review, 24(2), 233-236.
  10. Government of Tanzania. (2019). e-Government Act No.10. Dar es Salaam: Government Printer.
  11. Haemmerli, L., & Stauffacher, M. (2020). The neglected role of risk mitigation perception in the risk governance of underground technologies—the example of induced seismicity. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 11, 630-639.
  12. Halachmi, A., & Bovaird, T. (1997). Process reengineering in the public sector: learning some private sector lessons. Technovation, 17, 227-235.
  13. Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution. HarperBusiness.
  14. Heeks, R. (2002). Digital transformation in governance: Successes and challenges in developing countries. The Information Society, 18(2), 101-112.
  15. Heeks, R. (2002). Information Systems and Developing Countries: Failure, Success, and Local Improvisations. The Information Society.
  16. Imenda, S. (2014). Is there a conceptual difference between theoretical and conceptual frameworks? Journal of Social Sciences, 38(2), 185-195.
  17. Kanyangarara, M., Munos, M. K., & Walker, N. (2017). Quality of antenatal care service provision in health facilities across sub–Saharan Africa: Evidence from nationally representative health facility assessments. Journal of global health, 7(2).
  18. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.
  19. Mlay, S. V., Zlotnikova, I., & Watundu, S. (2013). A quantitative analysis of business process reengineering and organizational resistance: the case of Uganda. The African Journal of Information Systems, 5, 1-26.
  20. Msanjila, Y., & Mbaruku, G. (2019). Challenges of ICT in public service delivery in Tanzania. Tanzania Journal of ICT and Public Services, 8(4), 223-240.
  21. Mukherjee, A., Musa, J., & Ngowi, T. (2021). Redesigning organizational processes for efficiency: Lessons from public sector reforms. Journal of Public Administration and Management, 15(2), 89-112.
  22. Mukherjee, D., Ghosh, S., & Dey, P. K. (2021). Role of BPR in the digital transformation of public services. Public Administration Review, 81(3), 411-427.
  23. Mutahaba, G. & Kiragu, K. (2002). Lessons of International and African Perspective on Public Service Reform: Example from Five African Countries.
  24. Mussa, J., & Ngowi, T. (2022). Addressing barriers in ICT integration for public sector reforms. Tanzania Policy Review, 7(3), 55-73.
  25. Naveeda, S., & Seher Naveeda, D. (2014). Business Process Reengineering and Organizational Structure. S O C R A T E S, 2(2), 126–138.
  26. Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995). The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics Innovation. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, UK.
  27. Nuhu, S., Mwakasangula, E., & Mwita, P. (2020). Stakeholder perspectives in public-private partnerships: Challenges and opportunities in Tanzania. East African Journal of Governance, 9(1), 71-95.
  28. Oneill, Peter & Sohal, Amrik. (1999). Business Process Reengineering A review of recent literature. Technovation. 19. 571-581.
  29. Rudasill, K. M., Snyder, K. E., Levinson, H., & Adelson, J. (2018). Systems view of school climate: A theoretical framework for research. Educational Psychology Review, 30(1), 35–60.
  30. Saputra, A. (2022). Participatory innovation in public service delivery. Innovation and Governance Journal, 6(4), 85-100.
  31. Schutte, L., Brdar, I., Wissing, M. P., Tončić, M., Araujo, U., Carlquist, E., ... & Delle Fave, A. (2023). Measurement invariance of the meaning in life questionnaire across 17 countries. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 18(3), 1491-1519.
  32. Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75.
  33. Teece, D.J. (2007) Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Micro Foundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1319-1350.
  34. West, S. (2016). Sampling techniques in social research. Journal of Applied Social Science Research, 11(5), 34-52.

This study analyzes critical components for successful Business Process Reengineering (BPR) implementation to enhance online public service delivery in Tanzania. BPR aims to rethink and redesign organizational processes to improve performance metrics such as cost, quality, service, and speed. In Tanzania's public sector, BPR is essential for addressing bureaucratic inefficiencies, inadequate infrastructure, and skill gaps that hinder effective service delivery. Key findings emphasize the importance of stakeholder engagement, leadership commitment, organizational readiness, citizen-centric approaches, information technology, change management, and legal reform. These elements ensure that reengineered processes align with organizational goals and citizen needs. Leadership drives change, while technology integration enhances efficiency. Stakeholder involvement and readiness are crucial for adapting to new systems. The study also identifies gaps in Tanzania's online service delivery, including limited ICT infrastructure, resistance to change, and low digital literacy. These challenges undermine the potential of online services but can be addressed by implementing the identified components, leading to more effective and citizen-centric services. By developing a comprehensive BPR framework, this study guides public administrators in navigating process transformation, ensuring improved service quality and citizen satisfaction in Tanzania's public sector.

Keywords : Business Process Re-engineering, Online Service Delivery, Public Sector, Digital Transformation, Stakeholder Engagement, Tanzania, Public Service Delivery, Business Process, Process Improvement, Information and Communication Technology, Process Mapping.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe