⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



An Explainable Hybrid Deep Learning System for Medical Insurance Premium Optimisation to Minimise Out-of-Pocket Shortfalls in Zimbabwe


Authors : Robert Machovo; Tawanda Mudawarima

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 5 - May


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/mv7355ce

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/77jpakd9

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26May867

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : The context regarding the issue of medical insurance coverage in Zimbabwe can be considered through the perspective of critical coverage rates (10–15%) and out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses contributing to 37% of total healthcare expenditure, along with actuarial sustainability problems as a result of economic instability, hyperinflation, and fluctuations in the exchange rate. Conventional actuarial methodologies applied to assess risk factor interaction are unable to tackle such a problem efficiently. Thus, the Explainable Artificial Intelligence Premium Optimisation System (XAI-POS) based on the implementation of LSTM, CNN algorithms, and RL for modelling health risks and premium optimisation is suggested as a solution for the research problem. The dataset included 1,500 patient records with 87 variables from 2020 to 2025 (IPEC Administrative Returns, Ethics Clearance: HIT-REC-2024-0147; IPEC Data Access Agreement: IPEC-DAA-2024-009). Temporal train/test split approach for avoiding data leakage in the cross-sectionally divided dataset was utilised since the latter could potentially affect the results obtained (the 2020-2022 dataset with n=900 patients became the training set, while 2023-2025 dataset with n=600 patients – test set). The RL agent underwent training via 500 episodes using the epsilon-greedy algorithm. Some of the major results obtained include: 0.88 ± 0.02 for an individual healthcare cost prediction model Rsquared on the testing dataset, a decrease by 18.9 percent in average OOP gap, decrease of 11.5 percentage points in the number of catastrophic expenditure cases, affordability rating for premium of 74 out of 100, actuarial loss ratio between 0.60 and 0.85 for sustainable level, and decrease in premium Gini coefficient from 0.412 to 0.331.

Keywords : Medical Insurance Premium Optimisation, Deep Learning, Out-of-Pocket Health Expenditure, Reinforcement Learning, Explainable Artificial Intelligence.

References :

  1. Abiodun, O.I., Jantan, A., Omolara, A.E., Dada, K.V., Mohamed, N.A. and Arshad, H. (2021). State-of-the-art in artificial neural network applications: A survey. Heliyon, 4(11), e00938.
  2. Braunsteins, P. and Mandjes, M. (2023). Advances in actuarial science: A critical review of traditional model limitations in modern healthcare contexts. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 90(2), pp. 341–378.
  3. Carrin, R. and James, C. (2021). Social health insurance: Key factors affecting the transition towards universal coverage. International Social Security Review, 74(1), pp. 23–48.
  4. Chikanda, A. (2021). Medical leave: The exodus of health professionals from Zimbabwe. Journal of Southern African Studies, 32(3), pp. 507–526.
  5. Dlamini, S. and Sibanda, M. (2023). Machine learning for medical aid claims prediction in eSwatini. African Journal of Health Economics, 12(1), pp. 45–62.
  6. Frees, E.W. (2022). Regression Modelling with Actuarial and Financial Applications. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y. and Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  8. Goodman, B. and Flaxman, S. (2017). European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a 'right to explanation'. AI Magazine, 38(3), pp. 50–57.
  9. Henckaerts, R., Côté, M.P., Antonio, K. and Verbelen, R. (2022). Boosting insurance pricing with machine learning. ASTIN Bulletin, 52(1), pp. 1–30.
  10. Hochreiter, S. and Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), pp. 1735–1780.
  11. Insurance and Pensions Commission of Zimbabwe (IPEC) (2022). Annual Insurance and Pensions Industry Report 2022. Harare: IPEC.
  12. Insurance and Pensions Commission of Zimbabwe (IPEC) (2023). Annual Insurance and Pensions Industry Report 2023. Harare: IPEC.
  13. Insurance and Pensions Commission of Zimbabwe (IPEC) (2024). Data Access Agreement IPEC-DAA-2024-009: Administrative Returns Dataset for Academic Research. Harare: IPEC.
  14. Insurance and Pensions Commission of Zimbabwe (IPEC) (2025). Field Consultation on Health Insurance Shortfall Challenges in Zimbabwe. [Unpublished field report]. Harare: IPEC.
  15. James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T. and Tibshirani, R. (2021). An Introduction to Statistical Learning with Applications in R. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
  16. Kaas, R., Goovaerts, M., Dhaene, J. and Denuit, M. (2021). Modern Actuarial Risk Theory: Using R. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  17. Kuo, K. and Richman, R. (2021). Convolutional neural networks for insurance pricing. ASTIN Bulletin, 51(2), pp. 453–490.
  18. Lundberg, S.M., Erion, G., Chen, H., DeGrave, A., Prutkin, J.M., Nair, B. and Lee, S.I. (2020). From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2(1), pp. 56–67.
  19. Naik, N., Hameed, B.M.Z., Shetty, D.K., Swain, D., Shah, M., Paul, R. and Somani, B.K. (2022). Legal and ethical consideration in artificial intelligence in healthcare: Who takes responsibility? Frontiers in Surgery, 9, 862322.
  20. Rajpurkar, P., Chen, E. and Lungren, M.P. (2022). AI in health and medicine. Nature Medicine, 28(1), pp. 31–38.
  21. Ratner, B. (2023). Statistical Modelling and Analysis for Database Marketing: Effective Techniques for Mining Big Data. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
  22. Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe (RBZ) (2024). Monetary Policy Committee Statement and Financial Stability Report. Harare: RBZ.
  23. Richman, R. (2021). AI in actuarial science — A review of recent advances. Annals of Actuarial Science, 15(2), pp. 207–229.
  24. Wagstaff, A. and Neelsen, S. (2020). A comprehensive assessment of universal health coverage in 111 countries. npj Global Health, 3(1), p. 22.
  25. Wiley, J. (2021). Multi-objective optimisation in insurance pricing: Pareto frontier approaches. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 98, pp. 114–129.
  26. World Health Organisation (WHO) (2022). Global Health Expenditure Database. Geneva: WHO. Available at: https://apps.who.int/nha/database.
  27. Wüthrich, M.V. and Merz, M. (2023). Statistical Foundations of Actuarial Learning and Its Applications. Cham: Springer.
  28. Zimbabwe National Statistics Agency (ZimStat) (2020). Zimbabwe Poverty Update 2020: Household Income and Expenditure Survey. Harare: ZimStat.

The context regarding the issue of medical insurance coverage in Zimbabwe can be considered through the perspective of critical coverage rates (10–15%) and out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses contributing to 37% of total healthcare expenditure, along with actuarial sustainability problems as a result of economic instability, hyperinflation, and fluctuations in the exchange rate. Conventional actuarial methodologies applied to assess risk factor interaction are unable to tackle such a problem efficiently. Thus, the Explainable Artificial Intelligence Premium Optimisation System (XAI-POS) based on the implementation of LSTM, CNN algorithms, and RL for modelling health risks and premium optimisation is suggested as a solution for the research problem. The dataset included 1,500 patient records with 87 variables from 2020 to 2025 (IPEC Administrative Returns, Ethics Clearance: HIT-REC-2024-0147; IPEC Data Access Agreement: IPEC-DAA-2024-009). Temporal train/test split approach for avoiding data leakage in the cross-sectionally divided dataset was utilised since the latter could potentially affect the results obtained (the 2020-2022 dataset with n=900 patients became the training set, while 2023-2025 dataset with n=600 patients – test set). The RL agent underwent training via 500 episodes using the epsilon-greedy algorithm. Some of the major results obtained include: 0.88 ± 0.02 for an individual healthcare cost prediction model Rsquared on the testing dataset, a decrease by 18.9 percent in average OOP gap, decrease of 11.5 percentage points in the number of catastrophic expenditure cases, affordability rating for premium of 74 out of 100, actuarial loss ratio between 0.60 and 0.85 for sustainable level, and decrease in premium Gini coefficient from 0.412 to 0.331.

Keywords : Medical Insurance Premium Optimisation, Deep Learning, Out-of-Pocket Health Expenditure, Reinforcement Learning, Explainable Artificial Intelligence.

Paper Submission Last Date
30 - June - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe