Authors :
Adhie Hendrawan; Titien Agustina; Syamsuddinnor
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 12 - December
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/5n6t9msa
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/4fsz64bb
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25dec938
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.
Abstract :
This study examines the influence of leadership, work motivation, and organizational culture on employee
performance at the Pulau Laut Kepulauan Sub-District Office, Kotabaru Regency. The research was conducted using a
quantitative approach, with data collected through questionnaires distributed to employees of the sub-district office.
Multiple linear regression analysis was employed to test the proposed hypotheses, supported by F-tests and t-tests using
SPSS. The results indicate that leadership, work motivation, and organizational culture each have a positive and significant
effect on employee performance. Simultaneously, these three variables also significantly influence employee performance.
Effective leadership contributes to clear direction, motivation, and a supportive work environment, while high work
motivation encourages employees to perform their duties responsibly and productively. In addition, a positive organizational
culture fosters discipline, cooperation, and commitment among employees. The findings suggest that strengthening
leadership quality, enhancing employee motivation, and continuously developing organizational culture are essential
strategies for improving employee performance and the quality of public services at the sub-district level.
Keywords :
Leadership; Work Motivation; Organizational Culture; Employee Performance.
References :
- Amstrong, Michael. 1998. Seni Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Penterjemah : Sofyan Cikmat dan Haryanto, PT.Alex Media Komputindo, Jakarta.
- Arikunto, S. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian suatu Pendekatan Praktek, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
- David, F. R. 2009. Manajemen Strategis: Konsep, Salemba Empat, Jakarta.
- Dessler, Gary. 2005. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Alih bahasa: Eli Tanya. Penyunting Bahasa: Budi Supriyanto. Jakarta.
- Fahmi (2016:122), Fahmi. Irham. (2016). Pengantar Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Konsep dam Kinerja. Mitra Wacana Media: Jakarta
- Febriyani, Heryono Suslo Utomo, Fajar Apriani, 2021, Pengaruh Kepemimpinan dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai TK2D (Tenaga Kerja Kontrak Daerah) Di Kantor Camat Kecamatan Telen Kabupaten Kuatai Timur, eJournal Administrasi Publik, Vol.. 9 Nomor 1.
- Florentina Meldawati Duha, Yohanes Dakhi, Progresif Buulolo, 2022, Pengaruh Kepemimpinan dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Kantor Camat Toma Kabupaten Nias Selatan, Pareto : Jurnal Riset Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Vol. 7, Nomor 1.
- Garvin, DA. 2000. Kualitas Produk : Alat Strategi Yang Penting.Jakarta.FreePress. Edisi III
- Ghozali, Imam. 2013. Aplikasi Analisis Multivriate dengan Program SPSS. (Edisi 7) Badan Penerbit Universitas Dipenogoro, Semarang.
- Handoko. T. Hani, 2015, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Cetakan Pertama. Bandung: Pustaka Setia, Bandung
- Hasibuan, Malayu. (2016). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Penerbit Bumi Aksara.
- Mangkunegara, Anwar Prabu. 2005. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Badan penerbit PT. Rosdakarya, Bandung.
- Mangkunegara, Anwar Prabu. 2006. Evaluasi Kinerja SDM. Rafika Aditama, Cetakan Kedua, Bandung.
- Ni Made Wiwik Pratiwi, 2019, Pengaruh Kepemimpinan, Budaya Kerja dan Motivasi Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Di Kantor Camat Petang Kabupaten Badung, Jurnal Widya Publika, Vol. 7, No. 1 Juni 2019.
- Novi Kusumaningsih, Muhammad Tahwin, 2022, Pengaruh Budaya Kerja dan Motivasi Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Kantor Kecamatan Sluke Kabupaten Rembang, Buletin Bisnis & Manajemen, Vol. 8 No. 01.
- Pabundu, Tika. 2008. Budaya Organisasi dan Peningkatan Kinerja Perusahaan. Bumi Aksara, Jakarta
- Patton, A. 2006. Manajemen Pengembangan Organisasi, Fajar Harapan, Surabaya.
- Prasetyo, Lis. 2008. Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Terhadap Kinerja. Jurnal NeoBisnis, Desember Vol 2,No.2.
- Robbins Stephen. P, Judge Timonthy A. 2008. Perilaku Organisasi. Salemba Empat, Jakarta.
- Saydam, Gouzali. 1996 Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Penerbit Djambatan, Jakarta.
- Santosa, Purbayu budi. Dkk. 2005. Analisis statistik dengan Microsoft excel dan SPSS, Penerbit Andi, Yogyakarta.
- Sedarmayanti. 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Cet.kelima. PT Refika Aditama, Bandung.
- Siagian, Sondang. 2004. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta : PT. Bumi Askara.
- Simamora, Henry. 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, STIE YKPN, Yogyakarta.
- Siti Rahmah Fatimah, Sylvia Sjarlis, Salim Sultan, 2023, Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan, Budaya Kerja dan Kepuasan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja ASN Pada Kantor Camat Bantaeng Kabupaten Bantaeng.
- Stephen P. Robbins dan Mary Coulter. 2010. Manajemen. Ed-10. Jakarta: Erlangga, Jakarta.
- Sucipto, Agus, dan Siswanto. 2008. Teori dan Perilaku Organisasi. UIN-Malang Press, Malang.
- Sugiyono. 2008. Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D, edisi keempat Bandung: Alfabeta.
- Supardi dan Anwar, S. 2007. Dasar-Dasar Prilaku Organisasi, UII Press, Yogyakarta.
- Sutrisno, Edy. 2009. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Ed.1. Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.
- Sugiyono. 2008. Memahami penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta, Bandung.
- Thoha, Miftah. 2010. Kepemimpinan dalam Manajemen. PT Rajagrafindo Persada, Jakarta.
- Veithzal, Rivai. 2009. Manajemen Sumber Data Manusia untuk Perusahaan, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafido Persada.
- Want, Jerome. 2007. Corporate Culture. New York:St. Martin’s Press.
- Wibowo. 2012. Manajemen Kinerja, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
This study examines the influence of leadership, work motivation, and organizational culture on employee
performance at the Pulau Laut Kepulauan Sub-District Office, Kotabaru Regency. The research was conducted using a
quantitative approach, with data collected through questionnaires distributed to employees of the sub-district office.
Multiple linear regression analysis was employed to test the proposed hypotheses, supported by F-tests and t-tests using
SPSS. The results indicate that leadership, work motivation, and organizational culture each have a positive and significant
effect on employee performance. Simultaneously, these three variables also significantly influence employee performance.
Effective leadership contributes to clear direction, motivation, and a supportive work environment, while high work
motivation encourages employees to perform their duties responsibly and productively. In addition, a positive organizational
culture fosters discipline, cooperation, and commitment among employees. The findings suggest that strengthening
leadership quality, enhancing employee motivation, and continuously developing organizational culture are essential
strategies for improving employee performance and the quality of public services at the sub-district level.
Keywords :
Leadership; Work Motivation; Organizational Culture; Employee Performance.