⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



Aligning Teaching Practices to Results-Based Performance Management System: An Exposure of Experiences


Authors : Maricar D. Cameguing

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 8 - August


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3h2d2e4z

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/3nrjm39x

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26aug289

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : This study discovered the experiences and challenges of teachers aligning their teaching practices to results-based performance and management system. There were ten (10) elementary teachers of Buhangin-A District, Division of Davao City who participated in the study. This study made use of a phenomenological approach to extract the reflections of the participants. The in-depth-interview was employed to gather some information with regards to their respective experiences and challenges. Based on the results of thematic analysis of the responses from the participants of the study, the following findings and their corresponding themes were revealed: the teaching practices of teachers focused on setting objectives, assessment of progress and effective classroom management. The challenges of teachers aligning their teaching practices to results-based performance and management system delved on time constraints, adapting teaching methods and pressures of accountability and performance expectations. The insights drawn from the findings of the study were the following: ensuring quality in teacher performance, alignment of instructional strategies to learning outcomes and continuous professional development. Findings revealed that aligning teaching practices of teachers to results-based performance and management system does not only enhance student outcomes but also empower teachers to continually improve. Making this study meaningful, publication to a reputable journal is essential.

Keywords : Teaching Practices; Results-Based Performance Management System; Exposure; Experiences.

References :

  1. Aaronson, D., Barrow, L., & Sander, W. (2007). Teachers and student achievement in the Chicago public high schools. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(1), 95–135.
  2. Akiba, M., LeTendre, G., & Scribner, J. (2007). Teacher quality, opportunity gap, and national achievement in 46 countries. Educational Researcher, 36(7), 369–387.
  3. Allison, A., & Sarah, E., L. (2021). Making a Tough Choice: Teacher Target-Setting and Student Achievement in a Teacher Performance System Using Student Learning Objectives:. AERA Open, 7(1):233285842097977-. Doi: 10.1177/2332858420979778
  4. Alvi, S., Rosidah, Wahyudin, R., Maharani, A., Ariansyah, A., & Imron, F. (2022). Penilian kinerja guru di sekolah dasar, antara tantangan dan peluang. Jurnal pendidikan Islam, 4(1), 001-023. https://doi.org/10.58577/dimar.v4i1.93
  5. Argon, T. (2015). Teachers views on performance and reward in the framework of expectancy theory. Journal of Education Sciences Research, 5(2), 143-164. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292078597_Teacher_views_on_performance_and_rewards_in_the_framework_of_expectancy_theory_Bekle nti_kurami_kapsaminda_performans_ve_odullere_yonelik_ogretmen_gorusleri
  6. Armstrong, M., & Baron, A. (2005). Managing performance: performance               management in action. CIPD Publishing.Asian Development Bank.An           Introduction to Results Management: Principles, Implications, and     Applications, 2006. Asian Development Bank. Results-Based Management Framework in the  Philippines: A GUIDEBOOK, 2013.
  7. Barcelon, Lydia D. (2013). Schools Administrators Competencies in Relation to     the Teachers Performance in Cluster B1 and B2 as Basis for an Action               Plan. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Laguna College of Business andArts).
  8. Barlan, Mirriam P. (2015). Principals’ Management Tasks in Promoting School-     Community Relationship in Selected Public Secondary Schools in the          Division of Calamba City (Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Laguna College             of Business and Arts)
  9. Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., et al. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180.
  10. Blank, R. K., & De Las Alas, N. (2009). The effects of teacher professional development on gains in student achievement: How meta analysis provides scientific evidence useful to education leaders. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED544700.pdf.
  11. Blazar, D. (2015). Effective teaching in elementary mathematics: Identifying classroom practices that support student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 48, 16–29.
  12. Blomeke, S., Olsen, R., & Suhl, U. (2016). Relation of student achievement to the quality of their teachers and instructional quality. In T. Nilson & J. Gustafsson (Eds.), Teacher quality, instructional quality and student outcomes. IEA Research for Education (Vol. 2, pp. 21–50). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-41252-8_2.
  13. Brown, A., & Green, B. (2019). "Creating an Effective Classroom Environment: Strategies for Establishing Expectations and Routines." Journal of Education Research, 25(2), 123-137.
  14. Boyd, D. J., Grossman, P. L., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2009). Teacher preparation and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 416–440.
  15. Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Lankford, H., & Loeb, S. (2006). How changes in entry requirements alter the teacher workforce and affect student achievement. Education Finance and Policy, 1(2), 176–216.
  16. Bussim, M (2012). Performance Management- how to get it right. 21st Century      Pay Solutions Group. Rosebank, Johannesburg. Department ofEducation.            Results-based Performance Management System Managers Manual
  17. Canon, Crisostomo B. (2015), Level of Awareness among Grades 7 and 8                Teachers and the Level of Support of DepEd Calamba City to Outcomes-     Based Education (OBE) Approach (Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Laguna     College of Business and Arts)
  18. Cattaneo, M., Oggenfuss, C., & Wolter, S. (2016). The more, the better? The impact of instructional time on student performance. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) Discussion Paper No. 9797. Bonn, Germany: Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit/Institute for the Study of Labor. Retrieved from ftp.iza.org/dp9797.pdf.
  19. Chang-juan, X., Kexin, Z., Suyi, L. (2023). Classroom Management Strategies in Secondary Language Education. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 8:1649-1654. Doi: 10.54097/ehss.v8i.4539
  20. Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., & Rockoff, J. E. (2014). Measuring the impacts of teachers II: Teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood. American Economic Review, 104(9), 2633–2679.
  21. Chingos, M., & Peterson, P. (2011). It’s easier to pick a good teacher than to train one: Familiar and new results on the correlates of teacher effectiveness. Economics of Education Review, 30(3), 449–465.
  22. Christina, N., G. (2021). Performance Assessment in Teacher Education Programs: Direct Evaluation of Teaching Ability.  258-273. Doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998-4697-0.CH014
  23. Claire, J. (2016). The nature and practice of goal setting in teacher appraisal within primary schools.
  24. Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. L. (2006). Teacher-student matching and the assessment of teacher effectiveness. Journal of Human Resources, 41(4), 778–820.
  25. Collinson, V. (1999). Redefining teacher excellence. Theory Into Practice, 38(1), 4–11. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849909543824.
  26. Common Core Standards Initiative. (2018). Preparing America’s students for success [www document]. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/.
  27. Constantine, J., Player, D., Silva, T., Hallgren, K., Grider, M., & Deke, J. (2009). An evaluation of teachers trained through different routes to certification. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance paper 2009-4043. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20094043/.
  28. Cornwall. McMillianB. Journals Hanushek, E. A., &Woessmann, L. (2007). The    role of education quality for LAGUNA COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND        GRADUATE SCHOOL economic growth. World Bank Policy Research     Working Paper Number 4122, World Bank, Washington, D. C.
  29. Daniel, M., J., & Scott, J., A. (2017). Aligning Instructional Strategies with Learning Outcomes and Leadership Competencies.. New directions for student leadership, 2017(156):43-58. Doi: 10.1002/YD.20270
  30. Deborah, K., R. (2012). Clearly Communicating the Learning Objective Matters. Middle School Journal, 43(5):16-24. Doi:10.1080/00940771.2012.11461825.
  31. De Grano, J. (2010). The performance level of Camp Vicente Lim National High   School in the implementation of School-Based Management  (SBM).                 (Unpublished master’s thesis, University of the Philippines at Los Banos,     College, Laguna)
  32. Department of Education Order No. 2, s. 2015. Implementation of the results-based performance management system (RPMS) in the Department of Education. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2015/02/06/do-2-s-2015-guidelines-on-the-establishment-and-implementation-of-the-results-based-performance management-system-rpms-in-the-department-of-education/
  33. Desimone, L., Porter, A., Garet, M., Yoon, K., & Birman, B. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2),
  34. Desimone, L., Smith, T., & Phillips, K. (2013). Teacher and administrator responses to standards-based reform. Teachers College Record, 115(8), 1–53.
  35. Dorin, I., & Teodora, I. (2018). A new adaptive teaching method for engineering school. Journal Plus Education, 6(2):124-131.
  36. Elaine, C. (2014). Tempo e performance no trabalho docente. Educação (UFSM), 39(3):541-552. Doi: 10.5902/1984644414250
  37. Gardner, John (2006). “Assessment and Learning” SAGE Publication LTD:             London Levy, Karla (2008). Programme/Project Management: The               Results-based Approach. ICRC’s Economic Security Unit
  38. Garet, M. S., Heppen, J. B., Walters, K., Parkinson, J., Smith, T. M., Song, M., et al. (2016). Focusing on mathematical knowledge: The impact of content-intensive teacher professional development. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance paper 2016-4010. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20094010/.
  39. Guansing, D., T., & Reyes, M., C. (2019) Classroom Management Practices and Students Academic Performance Basis for an Action Plan https://ojs.aaresearchindex.com/index.php/AAJMRA/article/view/5981
  40. Guo, Q., Ali, A., Albattat, A. (2023). The Impact of Teacher Quality Management on Student Performance in the Education Sector: Literature Review. World Journal of English Language, 13(3):156-156. doi: 10.5430/wjel.v13n3p156
  41. Hanushek, E., & Luque, J. (2003). Efficiency and equity in schools around the world. Economics of Education Review, 22(5), 481–502.
  42. Harris, D. N., & Sass, T. R. (2011). Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 798–812.
  43. Helmold, M., & Samara, W. (2020). Progress in performance management: Industry insights and case studies on principles, application tools, and practice. Springer  https://books.google.com.ph/books/about/Progress_in_Performance_Management.html?id=lE-iDwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
  44. Hill, H., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406.
  45. Japhet, E., L. (2023). The Application of Constructive Alignment Theory in Designing a Curriculum Unit in Information Systems. The education review, USA, 7(4):471-482. Doi: 10.26855/er.2023.04.015
  46. Jennifer, A., B., & Shelly, P. (2004). Research on improving teacher time management. Academic exchange quarterly, 8(3):27-30.
  47. Klassen, R. M., & Chiu, M. M. (2010). Effects on teachers' self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 741-756.
  48. Kyriacou, C. (2001). Teacher stress: Directions for future research. Educational Review, 53(1), 27-35.
  49. Korobe, Peter (2009). Factors affecting the performance of teachers in       secondary schools in Nakapiripirit District Makerere: University Institutional Repository. Peter Fane, Results-based management          framework in the Philippines: A Guidebook. Mandaluyong City,           Philippines: Asian Development Bank,
  50. Ladd, H. F., & Sorenson, L. C. (2017). Returns to teacher experience: Student achievement and motivation in middle school. Education Finance and Policy, 12(2), 241–279. Retrieved from https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/10.1162/EDFP_a_00194. Larchmont, NY: Eye of Education.
  51. Lavy, V. (2015). Do differences in schools’ instruction time explain international achievement gaps? Evidence from developed and developing countries. The Economic Journal, 125(11), 397–424.
  52. Leovigildo, L., D., M. (2022). Teaching and learning intervention in the educational setting: adapting the teacher theory model. International Journal of Educational Innovation and Research, 1(2):99-121. doi: 10.31949/ijeir.v1i2.2493
  53. Lukluk, A., M., Endang, F., Sri, M. (2019). Performance assessment: Teachers beliefs and practices in higher education.  13(4):518-526. Doi: 10.11591/EDULEARN.V13I4.13068
  54. Luschei, T., & Chudgar, A. (2011). Teachers, student achievement, and national income: A cross-national examination of relationships and interactions. Prospects, 41, 507–533.
  55. MacPhail, A., Tannehill, D., Leirhaug, P. E., & Borghouts, L. (2021). Promoting instructional alignment in physical education teacher education. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2021.1958177
  56. Metzler, J., & Woessman, L. (2012). The impact of teacher subject knowledge on student achievement: Evidence from within-teacher within-student variation. Journal of Development Economics, 99(2), 486–496.
  57. Mihaela, G., Shauna, M., H., Hazel, V., Rachelle, S., S. (2022). How a First-Year Geography Teacher Adapts Instruction to Respond to Her Students. The social studies, 113(5):237-248. doi: 10.1080/00377996.2022.2046995
  58. Montt, G. (2011). Cross-national differences in educational achievement inequality. Sociology of Education, 84(1), 49–68.
  59. Osias, K. T., Kilag, R., Ignacio, G. U., Alvez, J. M., & Villagorda, S. (2023). Implication of individual plan for professional development (IPPD) on teachers’ professional development and career advancement. Basic and Applied Education Research Journal, 4(1), 12-18.
  60. Palardy, G. J., & Rumberger, R. W. (2008). Teacher effectiveness in first grade: The importance of background qualifications, attitudes, and instructional practices for student learning. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(2), 111–140.
  61. Pil, F. K., & Leana, C. (2009). Applying organizational research to public school reform: The effects of teacher human and social capital on student performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52(6), 1101–1124.
  62. Polikoff, M., & Porter, A. (2014). Instructional alignment as a measure of teaching quality. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(4), 399–416.
  63. Purvis, R. L., Zagenczyk, T. J., & McCray, G. E. (2015). What's in it for me? Using expectancy theory and climate to explain stakeholder participation, its direction and intensity. International Journal of Project Management. 33 (1), 3–14.
  64. Rockoff, J. E., Jacob, B. A., Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2011). Can you recognize an effective teacher when you recruit one? Education Finance and Policy, 6(1), 43–74.
  65. Ronnie, D. (2016). Goal Setting to Increase Student Academic Performance..  1(1):44-46. Doi: 10.32674/JSARD.V1I1.1908
  66. Schmidt, W., Burroughs, N., Zoido, P., & Houang, R. (2015). The role of schooling in perpetuating educational inequality: An international perspective. Education Researcher, 44(4), 371–386.
  67. Shahid Jan et al. The Effect of Performance Management System on Teachers’       Efficiency: A Case Study of Private Schools in District Peshawar. Life Sci                J 2014;11(4):79-85]. (ISSN:1097-8135). United Nations Development     Group. Result-Based Management Handbook,  Oct.2011.
  68. Shuls, J., & Trivitt, J. (2015). Teacher effectiveness: An analysis of licensure screens. Educational Policy, 29(4), 645–675.
  69. Smith, A. D., & Rupp, W. T. (2003). Knowledge workers: exploring the link among performance rating, pay and motivational aspects. Journal of Knowledge Management. 7(1), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270310463662
  70. Srinivasa, K., G. (2022). Adaptive Teaching/Learning.  201-240. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-6734-4_9
  71. Staiger, D., & Rockoff, J. (2010). Searching for effective teachers with imperfect information. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(3), 97–118.
  72. Stronge, J. H. (2018). Evaluating teaching: A guide to current thinking and best practice. Corwin Press.
  73. Timor, T., S. (2022). Continuing Professional Development in Education.  57-69. Doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-5069-8_4
  74. Vasumathi, T (2010). A Design for Professional Development of Teachers Need     for New Policy Framework. Retrieved September 19, 2013 at            http://www.eric.ed.gov /PDFS/ED512828.pdf
  75. Vroom, V. (1964) Work and Motivation. Wiley and Sons, New York.
  76. Wallace, M. R. (2009). Making sense of the links: Professional development, teacher practices, and student achievement. Teachers College Record, 111(2), 573–596.
  77. Wayne, A. J., & Youngs, P. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review. Review of Educational Research, 73(1), 89–122.
  78. William, S., N. (2005). Homework and performance for time-constrained students. Economics Bulletin, 9(1):1-6.
  79. Woessman, L. (2003). Schooling resources, educational institutions, and student performance: The international evidence. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65(2), 117–170.
  80. Wolde, D. (2021). Influence of continuous professional development for secondary school teachers on academic performance in public secondary schools in Rwanda. A case of Karongi District. International Journal of Education and Practice, 9(3), 497-506
  81. Zafarullah, S., Mumtaz, K., Uzma, M., P., Abida, S., Humera, S. (2016). Teachers’ Time Management and the Performance of Students: A Comparison of Government and Private Schools of Hyderabad, Sindh, Pakistan.. World Journal of Education, 6(6):42-50. Doi: 10.5430/WJE.V6N6P42
  82. Zepeda, S.J. (2007). Instructional supervision: Applying tools and Concepts.

This study discovered the experiences and challenges of teachers aligning their teaching practices to results-based performance and management system. There were ten (10) elementary teachers of Buhangin-A District, Division of Davao City who participated in the study. This study made use of a phenomenological approach to extract the reflections of the participants. The in-depth-interview was employed to gather some information with regards to their respective experiences and challenges. Based on the results of thematic analysis of the responses from the participants of the study, the following findings and their corresponding themes were revealed: the teaching practices of teachers focused on setting objectives, assessment of progress and effective classroom management. The challenges of teachers aligning their teaching practices to results-based performance and management system delved on time constraints, adapting teaching methods and pressures of accountability and performance expectations. The insights drawn from the findings of the study were the following: ensuring quality in teacher performance, alignment of instructional strategies to learning outcomes and continuous professional development. Findings revealed that aligning teaching practices of teachers to results-based performance and management system does not only enhance student outcomes but also empower teachers to continually improve. Making this study meaningful, publication to a reputable journal is essential.

Keywords : Teaching Practices; Results-Based Performance Management System; Exposure; Experiences.

Paper Submission Last Date
31 - August - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe