Authors : Peter Muwarure; Otaraku Ipeghan; Amiye Francis

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 5 - May

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/yrxtxzdw

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25may940

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : Wastewater and exhaust gases from diesel engines are significant environmental pollutants, contributing to nutrient overload and greenhouse emissions. However, these waste products offer a potential solution for nutrient recycling and fish feed production. This study explores the sustainable cultivation of algae using wastewater and captured diesel exhaust gas from diesel generators for fish feed production, addressing environmental and economic challenges in aquaculture. Wastewater from fishponds and food processing industries, along with exhaust gas from diesel generators, were analyzed for their physicochemical and biological properties. Algae species such as Chlorella vulgaris and Cyclotella sp. were successfully cultured in the wastewater enriched with exhaust gas, demonstrating high nutrient content suitable for fish feed. African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) fed the algae-based diet exhibited superior growth (25 cm final length, 0.8 kg weight gain) and lower mortality (12.5%) compared to ca control group fed conventional feed (22 cm, 0.5 kg, 25% mortality). Hematological analysis indicated enhanced immune response in algae-fed fish, though slight liver and kidney stress was observed. The results confirm the feasibility of repurposing wastewater and exhaust gas for algae production, offering a sustainable alternative to conventional fish feed while mitigating environmental pollution. This approach supports resource efficiency and food security, aligning with sustainable goals. Further optimization of the algae culture process could enhance its scalability and minimize metabolic stress in fish.

Keywords : Algae; Wastewater; Exhaust Gas Capture; Fish Farming; Sustainability.

References :

1. M. V. Twigg, “Progress and future challenges in controlling automotive exhaust gas emissions,” Applied Catalysis B Environment and Energy, vol. 70, no. 1–4, pp. 2–15, Jul. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2006.02.029.
2. H. N. Sandefur, M. D. Matlock, and T. A. Costello, “Seasonal productivity of a periphytic algal community for biofuel feedstock generation and nutrient treatment,” Ecological Engineering, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1476–1480, May 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.04.002.
3. R. Ramanan, B.-H. Kim, D.-H. Cho, H.-M. Oh, and H.-S. Kim, “Algae–bacteria interactions: Evolution, ecology and emerging applications,” Biotechnology Advances, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 14–29, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.12.003.
4. R. Sayre, “Microalgae: the potential for carbon capture,” BioScience, vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 722–727, Oct. 2010, doi: 10.1525/bio.2010.60.9.9.
5. T. Mutanda, D. Naidoo, J. K. Bwapwa, and A. Anandraj, “Biotechnological applications of microalgal oleaginous compounds: Current trends on microalgal bioprocessing of products,” Frontiers in Energy Research, vol. 8, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2020.598803.
6. P. Hansen, “Effect of high pH on the growth and survival of marine phytoplankton: implications for species succession,” Aquatic Microbial Ecology, vol. 28, pp. 279–288, Jan. 2002, doi: 10.3354/ame028279.
7. C. Y. Chen and E. G. Durbin, “Effects of pH on the growth and carbon uptake of marine phytoplankton.,” Ecology-progress Series, vol. 109, pp. 83–94, 1994, [Online]. Available: https://www.int-res.com/articles/meps/109/m109p083.pdf
8. K. Marimuthu, H. Palaniandya, and Z. A. Muchlisin, “Effect of different water pH on hatching and survival rates of African catfish Clarias gariepinus (Pisces: Clariidae),” Aceh Journal of Animal Science, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 80–88, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.13170/ajas.4.2.13574.
9. U. C. Ndubuisi, A. J. Chimezie, U. C. Chinedu, I. C. Chikwem, and U. Alexander, “Effect of pH on the growth performance and survival rate of Clarias gariepinus fry,” International Journal of Research in Biosciences, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 14–20, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306241122
10. S. Vijayaram, E. Ringø, H. Ghafarifarsani, S. H. Hoseinifar, S. Ahani, and C.-C. Chou, “Use of Algae in Aquaculture: A review,” Fishes, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 63, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.3390/fishes9020063.
11. M. a. B. Siddik, P. Francis, M. F. Rohani, M. S. Azam, T. S. Mock, and D. S. Francis, “Seaweed and Seaweed-Based functional metabolites as potential modulators of growth, immune and antioxidant responses, and gut microbiota in fish,” Antioxidants, vol. 12, no. 12, p. 2066, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.3390/antiox12122066.
12. R. Shields and I. Lupatsch, “5 Algae for aquaculture and animal feeds,” in De Gruyter eBooks, 2012, pp. 79–100. doi: 10.1515/9783110298321.79.
13. Y. -l. Enyu and A. C. Shu-Chien, “Proteomics analysis of mitochondrial extract from liver of female zebrafish undergoing starvation and refeeding,” Aquaculture Nutrition, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. e413–e423, Jul. 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2095.2010.00776.x.
14. S. Ganguly, K. C. Dora, S. Sarkar, and S. Chowdhury, “Supplementation of prebiotics in fish feed: a review,” Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 195–199, Oct. 2012, doi: 10.1007/s11160-012-9291-5.
15. J. Thornburg, “Feed the fish: A review of aquaculture feeders and their strategic implementation,” Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, vol. 56, no. 2, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1111/jwas.70016.
16. J. W. Hertrampf and F. Piedad-Pascual, Handbook on Ingredients for Aquaculture Feeds. 2000. doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-4018-8.