AI as a Cognitive Partner: A Systematic Review of the Influence of AI on Metacognition and Self-Reflection in Critical Thinking


Authors : Anubha Goyal

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 3 - March

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/y8wrus8p

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/5fhbfc27

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25mar1427

PlumX Metrics

Semantic Scholar

ResearchGate

IJISRT Repository

Google Scholar

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 15 to 20 days to display the article.

Abstract : Educational settings today include Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems that transform student interaction with critical thinking and metacognitive processes. The research assesses AI’s positive and negative effects on developing cognitive abilities through systematic analysis and review. Contemporary learning tools backed by artificial intelligence provide individualised feedback, automated tutoring, and adaptive testing that enhances students’ problem-solving skills and cognitive awareness. Concerns regarding cognitive offloading, metacognitive sloth, and algorithmic bias challenge the possible impact of AI on independent thinking and learning autonomy. This study synthesises existing research to investigate how AI works as a cognitive partner that supports critical thinking ability and a potential barrier to long-term cognitive engagement in learning environments. Evidence shows that AI supports learning assistance and self-regulation development, but overdependence on it results in lower problem-solving skills and decreased metacognitive thinking. Data privacy issues, access fairness concerns, and AI decision-making biases make it necessary for educational institutions to control their incorporation of AI technologies carefully. The review highlights necessary teaching practices for the ethical use of AI and advocates for equitable AI-human collaboration to produce compelling learning experiences. The report recommends that educators and policymakers implement measures to ensure that AI applications augment critical thinking capabilities rather than replace them. Long- term studies must assess the impact of AI on students’ cognitive resilience and how they learn adaptive learning strategies. This review aims to construct AI-fortified educational designs by leveraging AI’s potential and risks to enhance students’ inquiry skills, self-reflection, and critical thinking capabilities.

Keywords : Artificial Intelligence, Critical Thinking, Metacognition, Self-Reflection, Cognitive Offloading, AI in Education, Systematic Literature Review.

References :

  1. Rivas SF, Saiz C, Ossa C. Metacognitive Strategies and Development of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022 Jun 15;13.
  2. Onesi-Ozigagun O, Ogundipe D, Eyo-Udo N, Ololade Y. REVOLUTIONIZING EDUCATION THROUGH AI: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF ENHANCING LEARNING EXPERIENCES. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences. 2024 Apr 10;6(4):589–607.
  3. Rathika P, Anju P, Parthipan V, Yamunadevi S, Ponni P. Developing an AI-Powered Interactive Virtual Tutor for Enhanced Learning Experiences. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering. 2024 Dec 22;10(4).
  4. Lampou R. The Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Opportunities and Challenges. Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 2023 Aug 18;4(00):e015.
  5. Liang H, Yeh J, Hsu T, Hwang G. Effect of an AI‐based chatbot on students’ learning performance in alternate reality game‐based museum learning. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2024 Feb 27;55(5):2315–38.
  6. Çela E, Potluri RM, Fonkam MM. Risks of AI-Assisted Learning on Student Critical Thinking. International Journal of Risk and Contingency Management. 2024 Aug 5;12(1):1–19.
  7. Ahmad SF, Ariza-Montes A, Han H, Irshad M, Alam MM, Rehmat MK, et al. Impact of artificial intelligence on human loss in decision making, laziness and safety in education. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 2023 Jun 9;10(1).
  8. Sabharwal D, Srivastava K, Kabha R. Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Powered Virtual Assistants and their Effect on Human Productivity and Laziness: Study on Students of Delhi-NCR (India) & Fujairah (UAE). JOURNAL OF CONTENT COMMUNITY AND COMMUNICATION. 2023 Jun 30;17(9):162–74.
  9. Sanusi IT, Olaleye SA, Oyelere SS, Dixon RA. Investigating learners’ competencies for artificial intelligence education in an African K-12 setting. Computers and Education Open. 2022 Mar 20;3:100083.
  10. Zlateva P, Steshina L, Petukhov I, Velev D. A Conceptual Framework for Solving Ethical Issues in Generative Artificial Intelligence. In institut f r ost und s dosteuropaforschung; 2024.
  11. Artyukhov A, Vasylieva T, Bogacki S, Wołowiec T, Artyukhova N. SDG 4, Academic Integrity and Artificial Intelligence: Clash or Win-Win Cooperation? Sustainability. 2024 Sep 29;16(19):8483.
  12. Rusandi MA, Mutmainnah M, Saripah I, Ahman A, Khairun DY. No worries with ChatGPT: building bridges between artificial intelligence and education with critical thinking soft skills. Journal of Public Health. 2023 Apr 23;45(3):e602–3.
  13. Stanton JD, Dunlosky J, Sebesta AJ. Fostering Metacognition to Support Student Learning and Performance. CBE—Life Sciences Education. 2021 Jun 1;20(2):fe3.
  14. Williams RT. The ethical implications of using generative chatbots in higher education. Frontiers in Education. 2024 Jan 8;8.
  15. Barnes E, Hutson J. Navigating the ethical terrain of AI in higher education: Strategies for mitigating bias and promoting fairness. Forum for Education Studies. 2024 Jun 21;2(2):1229.
  16. Kontche Steve M. Ethical Considerations for Companies Implementing LLMs in Education Software. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT). 2024 Sep 7;1856–61.
  17. Owan VJ, Abang KB, Etta EO, Idika DO, Bassey BA. Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence tools in educational measurement and assessment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 2023 Aug 1;19(8):em2307.
  18. Zhang Y. The Research on Critical Thinking Teaching Strategies in College English Classroom. Creative Education. 2022 Jan 1;13(04):1469–85.
  19. Zua B. Literacy: Gateway to a World of Exploits. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies. 2021 Jan 31;9(1):96.
  20. Kalaiselvi D, Kokila S, Anandakumar S, Boopathi S, Sarkar R, Ramaratnam MS. Future Developments of Higher Education on Social Psychology. In igi global; 2024. p. 151–74.
  21. Campion MA, Lord RG. A control systems conceptualisation of the goal-setting and changing process. Organisational Behavior and Human Performance. 1982 Oct 1;30(2):265–87.
  22. Yu D, Shafran I, Zhao J, Narasimhan K, Yao S, Griffiths T, et al. Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models. cornell university; 2023.
  23. Raj A, Shukla D, Quadir A, Sharma P. What drives the adoption of digital technology in the micro, small, and medium enterprises sector in a developing economy? Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. 2024 Jul 5;39(9):1984–2002.
  24. Robison MK, Unsworth N. Working Memory Capacity Offers Resistance to Mind‐Wandering and External Distraction in a Context‐Specific Manner. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2015 Jul 24;29(5):680–90.
  25. Roman-Acosta D. Potential of artificial intelligence in textual cohesion, grammatical precision, and clarity in scientific writing. LatIA. 2024 Aug 25;2:110.
  26. Zhang Z. ChatGPT: Enhancing Learner Agency and Multilingual Practices in English Writing Class. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences. 2024 Mar 2;26:1153–60.
  27. Ghai B, Mueller K. D-BIAS: A Causality-Based Human-in-the-Loop System for Tackling Algorithmic Bias. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. 2022 Jan 1;29(1):1–10.
  28. Bansal G, Zahedi FM. Trust violation and repair: The information privacy perspective. Decision Support Systems. 2015 Jan 31;71:62–77.
  29. Zhao L, Ye C. Time and Performance in Online Learning: Applying the Theoretical Perspective of Metacognition. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education. 2020 Jul 1;18(3):435–55.
  30. Yıldız H, Akdağ M. The Effect of Metacognitive Strategies on Prospective Teachers’ Metacognitive Awareness and Self Efficacy Belief. Journal of Education and Training Studies. 2017 Nov 13;5(12):30.
  31. Lee P, Banerjee S, Chakraborty I. AI Applications to Customer Feedback Research: A Review. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2022 Jan 1;
  32. Cress U, Kimmerle J. Co-constructing knowledge with generative AI tools: Reflections from a CSCL perspective. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. 2023 Oct 20;18(4):607–14.
  33. Slight SP, Seger AC, Bates DW, Whitney DL, Schiff GD, Eguale T, et al. The vulnerabilities of computerised physician order entry systems: a qualitative study. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. 2015 Nov 13;23(2):311–6.
  34. Triberti S, Marsico E, Scuotto C, Limone P, Di Fuccio R. “Better than my professor?” How to develop artificial intelligence tools for higher education. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. 2024 Apr 10;7.
  35. Page MJ, Bossuyt PM, Shamseer L, Lalu MM, Glanville J, Mcdonald S, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviewsDeclaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas. Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health. 2022 Dec 30;46:1.
  36. Alhashim A, Hartog T, Okudan-Kremer G, Dickson D, Jonczyk R, Van Hell J, et al. Work in Progress: Assessing Creativity of Alternative Uses Task Responses: A Detailed Procedure. In asee conferences; 2020.
  37. Abu-Ghuwaleh M, Saffaf R. Integrating AI and NLP with Project-Based Learning in STREAM Education. mdpi ag; 2023.
  38. Ahsan I, Ahmed MA, Anwar MW, Butt WH. A comprehensive investigation of natural language processing techniques and tools to generate automated test cases. In association for computing machinery; 2017.
  39. Chen CH, Liu TK, Huang K. Scaffolding vocational high school students’ computational thinking with cognitive and metacognitive prompts in learning about programmable logic controllers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 2021 Nov 20;55(3):527–44.
  1. OHRC 2022: Right to Inquiry. https://www3.ohrc.on.ca/en/right-read-inquiry-report-0

 

Educational settings today include Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems that transform student interaction with critical thinking and metacognitive processes. The research assesses AI’s positive and negative effects on developing cognitive abilities through systematic analysis and review. Contemporary learning tools backed by artificial intelligence provide individualised feedback, automated tutoring, and adaptive testing that enhances students’ problem-solving skills and cognitive awareness. Concerns regarding cognitive offloading, metacognitive sloth, and algorithmic bias challenge the possible impact of AI on independent thinking and learning autonomy. This study synthesises existing research to investigate how AI works as a cognitive partner that supports critical thinking ability and a potential barrier to long-term cognitive engagement in learning environments. Evidence shows that AI supports learning assistance and self-regulation development, but overdependence on it results in lower problem-solving skills and decreased metacognitive thinking. Data privacy issues, access fairness concerns, and AI decision-making biases make it necessary for educational institutions to control their incorporation of AI technologies carefully. The review highlights necessary teaching practices for the ethical use of AI and advocates for equitable AI-human collaboration to produce compelling learning experiences. The report recommends that educators and policymakers implement measures to ensure that AI applications augment critical thinking capabilities rather than replace them. Long- term studies must assess the impact of AI on students’ cognitive resilience and how they learn adaptive learning strategies. This review aims to construct AI-fortified educational designs by leveraging AI’s potential and risks to enhance students’ inquiry skills, self-reflection, and critical thinking capabilities.

Keywords : Artificial Intelligence, Critical Thinking, Metacognition, Self-Reflection, Cognitive Offloading, AI in Education, Systematic Literature Review.

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe