Authors :
Isnafarinda Andriyani; Tatag Yuli Eko Siswono; Rooselyna Ekawati
Volume/Issue :
Volume 5 - 2020, Issue 6 - June
Google Scholar :
http://bitly.ws/9nMw
Scribd :
https://bit.ly/2C8OLma
DOI :
10.38124/IJISRT20JUN1103
Abstract :
This study aims to describe the adaptive
reasoning of students in solving beam mathematical
problems with high, medium, and low mathematical
solving abilities. The research location is at Siti Aminah
Surabaya elementary school, with 24 students in grades
VI-A and will take 3 students as research subjects. This
study uses qualitative research, by conducting several
stages, namely, preparation, implementation, and
analysis. Data analysis techniques used observation
methods, tests of ability to solve mathematical problems
(TPMM), and interviews. The results showed students
with high mathematical abilities students were able to
collect data then identify the components of the building
blocks, be able to provide evidence and explanations
and verify what he had obtained. Students with
mathematical abilities while students are able to
understand the problem by reading repeatedly to be
able to explain and verify their findings. Students with
low mathematical abilities are able to understand after
doing trial and error, understanding from many data
sources. From the experience and data sources obtained
by students, they are only able to understand the
problems, construct and connect with objects around
them, gather information, so they can provide an
explanation of the concept and verify it.
This study aims to describe the adaptive
reasoning of students in solving beam mathematical
problems with high, medium, and low mathematical
solving abilities. The research location is at Siti Aminah
Surabaya elementary school, with 24 students in grades
VI-A and will take 3 students as research subjects. This
study uses qualitative research, by conducting several
stages, namely, preparation, implementation, and
analysis. Data analysis techniques used observation
methods, tests of ability to solve mathematical problems
(TPMM), and interviews. The results showed students
with high mathematical abilities students were able to
collect data then identify the components of the building
blocks, be able to provide evidence and explanations
and verify what he had obtained. Students with
mathematical abilities while students are able to
understand the problem by reading repeatedly to be
able to explain and verify their findings. Students with
low mathematical abilities are able to understand after
doing trial and error, understanding from many data
sources. From the experience and data sources obtained
by students, they are only able to understand the
problems, construct and connect with objects around
them, gather information, so they can provide an
explanation of the concept and verify it.
