Authors :
Sujay Rao Mandavilli
Volume/Issue :
Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 7 - July
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/2xpjynye
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/yewtszry
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUL387
Abstract :
In many of our previous papers published
over the years, we had developed and propounded
concepts such as fuzzy logic, the theory of paradoxes, the
certainty uncertainty principle for the social sciences,
innovative methods for the social sciences, and had also
explained the importance of inductive approaches,
grounded theory, and nomothetic rule building. We had
also stated the importance of practicalism as a core
component of the philosophy of science. In this paper, we
state the importance of abstraction, conceptualization,
ideation, innovation, quantification, theorization,
objectivization and disambiguation in the social sciences,
and explain all of these concepts in detail. We also refer
to them as the “pillars of social sciences research
methods and techniques”, or “the guiding principles or
the guiding forces in the use or employment of social
science research methods and techniques, and social
science research activity”. These approaches are
necessary because social sciences research is mostly
qualitative; these techniques could impart quality and
objectivity to social science research in a way that other
techniques cannot. These are different from the
philosophy of science or the philosophy of social science,
and these we anticipate would guide and drive much of
social science research enterprise in the twenty-first
century and beyond. These are also foundationally
different from the objectives of social science research,
examples of which could be cultural emancipation,
inculcation of a scientific temper, etc. Needless to say,
these can be gainfully employed in the non social sciences
as well, though this is not our primary focus and
emphasis here.
References :
- Elucidating the Certainty uncertainty principle for the Social Sciences: Guidelines for hypothesis formulation in the Social Sciences for enhanced objectivity and intellectual multi-polarity Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT, March 2023
- Paradox identification and paradox resolution in scientific endeavour: Reconciliation of contradictory rulesets in the interests of better theorization and hypothesis-building Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT, January 2024
- Recommending probabilistic approaches for hypothesis evaluation: A gainful extension of the certainty uncertainty principle for the social sciences Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT, June 2024
- Quashing racism: Presenting the ‘Comprehensive sociocultural persecution complex’ as a logical extension and a practical application of the Certainty uncertainty principle for the social sciences Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT, September 2023
- Baking innovative and creative thinking techniques into scientific method: Towards innovative and creative techniques as an intrinsic part of scientific method for higher scientific and research output Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT January 2024
- Redefining Intellectualism for a post-globalized world: Why present-day intellectualism is obsolete and why a comprehensive reassessment of intellectualism is required Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT, August 2023
- Towards scientific apperception tests for twenty-first century social sciences research: Formulating ‘Structured apperception techniques for socio-cultural change’ in twenty-first century social sciences research Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT June 2023
- Conceptualizing ‘Cultural Frames of Reference’ and ‘Crosscultural Frames of Reference’ for various cultures and societies: Employing these concepts to bring about social and cultural change in different societies Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT, September 2023
- Articulating comprehensive frameworks on socio-cultural change: Perceptions of social and cultural change in contemporary Twenty-first century Anthropology from a ‘Neo-centrist’ perspective Published in ELK Asia Pacific Journal of Social Sciences Volume 3, Number 4 (July 2017 – September 2017) Sujay Rao Mandavilli
- The relevance of Culture and Personality Studies, National Character Studies, Cultural Determinism and Cultural Diffusion in Twenty-first Century Anthropology: An assessment of their compatibility with Symbiotic models of Socio-cultural change ELK Asia Pacific Journal of Social Science Volume 4, Issue 2, 2018 Sujay Rao Mandavilli
- Attempting Diachronic extensions of symbiotic approaches to socio-cultural change: Developing techniques to assess socio-cultural changes over a period in time Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT, September 2023
- Widening the scope of social science research to cover global considerations: How “practicalism” can help identify new vistas in social science research Sujay Rao Mandavilli Published in IJISRT, July 2024
- Disseminating the real-world importance of conjunct studies of acculturation, transculturation, and deculturation processes: Why this can be a useful technique to analyze real-world observations Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT, June 2024
- Robert A. Stebbins, Exploratory Research in the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2001.
- Russell K. Schutt, Investigating the Social World, 5th ed, Pine Forge Press.
- Jung, C.G. (1971). Psychological Types. Collected Works. Vol. 6 (1921 ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-01813-8
- Cantor, Norman F., and Peter L. Klein. Seventeenth-Century Rationalism: Bacon and Descartes. Massachusetts: Blaisdell, 1969
- Unveiling the Sociological Ninety-ten rules for Social Sciences research: Towards better hypothesis formulation in the Social Sciences in the interests of higher quality research and intellectual multi-polarity Sujay Rao Mandavilli Published in IJISRT, February 2023
- Quine, W. (1999). two dogmas of empiricism. In E. Margolis, & S. Lawrence, concepts: core readings (pp. 153–171). Massachusetts: MIT press.
- Edmonds, Philip; Kilgarriff, Adam (2002). "Introduction to the special issue on evaluating word sense disambiguation systems". Journal of Natural Language Engineering. 8 (4): 279–291
- Jonson, B (2005) "Design Ideation: the conceptual sketch in the digital age". Design Studies Vol 26 No 6 pp 613–624
- Michalko, Michael (2006) "Thinkertoys: A Handbook of Creative-Thinking Techniques Paperback" ISBN 978-1580087735
- Steven Johnson (2011). Where Good Ideas Come From. Riverhead Books. ISBN 978-1-59448-538-1.
- Sonenshein, Scott (2017). Stretch: Unlock the Power of Less and Achieve More Than You Ever Imagined. Harper Business. ISBN 978-0-06-245722-6
- Clouse, Barbara, 2006, Patterns for a Purpose: McGraw Hill Publishing Company, pg G-2
- Cattell, James McKeen; and Farrand, Livingston (1896) "Physical and mental measurements of the students of Columbia University", The Psychological Review, Vol. 3, No. 6 (1896), pp. 618–648; p. 648
- Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of management journal, 50(1), 25-32
In many of our previous papers published
over the years, we had developed and propounded
concepts such as fuzzy logic, the theory of paradoxes, the
certainty uncertainty principle for the social sciences,
innovative methods for the social sciences, and had also
explained the importance of inductive approaches,
grounded theory, and nomothetic rule building. We had
also stated the importance of practicalism as a core
component of the philosophy of science. In this paper, we
state the importance of abstraction, conceptualization,
ideation, innovation, quantification, theorization,
objectivization and disambiguation in the social sciences,
and explain all of these concepts in detail. We also refer
to them as the “pillars of social sciences research
methods and techniques”, or “the guiding principles or
the guiding forces in the use or employment of social
science research methods and techniques, and social
science research activity”. These approaches are
necessary because social sciences research is mostly
qualitative; these techniques could impart quality and
objectivity to social science research in a way that other
techniques cannot. These are different from the
philosophy of science or the philosophy of social science,
and these we anticipate would guide and drive much of
social science research enterprise in the twenty-first
century and beyond. These are also foundationally
different from the objectives of social science research,
examples of which could be cultural emancipation,
inculcation of a scientific temper, etc. Needless to say,
these can be gainfully employed in the non social sciences
as well, though this is not our primary focus and
emphasis here.