Authors :
Kavya Suredranath
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 4 - April
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/4uhup54w
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/5fum5p2s
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25apr394
Google Scholar
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Note : Google Scholar may take 15 to 20 days to display the article.
Abstract :
Security governance necessitates a comprehensive transformation as artificial intelligence (AI) continues to
revolutionize industrial operations. ISO/IEC 42001 provides a standardized approach to address AI security risks, as well as
compliance andethical concerns.This paper examinesthe components ofISO42001, explaining how the standard establishes a
robustframework that enables bestpracticesand secure AI governance across various domains.
References :
- Schneier, B. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Security Risks. Harvard University Press.
- Brundage, M., Avin, S., Wang, J., Belfield, H., Krueger, G., Hadfield, G., C Dafoe, (2020). Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claims. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.07213.
- ISO/IEC 42001. (2023). Artificial Intelligence – Management System Standard. International Organization for Standardization.
- Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., C Schafer, B. (2018). AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28, 689–707.
- Goodman, B., C Flaxman, S. (2017). European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a “right to explanation”. AI Magazine, 38(3), 50–57.
- Garfinkel, S. (2015). Privacy and Security in the Era of Big Data. ACM Queue, 13(6), 30–49.
- Doshi-Velez, F., C Kim, B. (2017). Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08608.
- Binns, R. (2018). Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophy. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency.
- Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., C Floridi, L. (2016). The Ethics of Algorithms: Mapping the Debate. Big Data C Society.
- Biggio, B., C Roli, F. (2018). Wild Patterns: Ten Years After the Rise of Adversarial Machine Learning. Pattern Recognition, 84, 317–331.
- McKinsey AI Report. (2021). The State of AI in 2021: A Half-Decade Review.
- Papernot, N., McDaniel, P., Goodfellow, I., Jha, S., Celik, Z. B., C Swami, A. (2016). Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learning. Proceedings of the ACM Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security.
- NIST Privacy Framework. (2020). A Tool for Improving Privacy through Enterprise Risk Management.
- ISO 27701. (2019). Privacy Information Management System. International Organization for Standardization.
- Shokri, R., Stronati, M., Song, C., C Shmatikov, V. (2017). Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning Models. IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy.
- Adadi, A., C Berrada, M. (2018). Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). IEEE Access, 6, 52138–52160.
- Weidinger, L., Uesato, J., Michel, T., C Gabriel, I. (2022). Ethical and Social Risks of AI: Challenges and Solutions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.04359.
- ISO 27001. (2022). Information Security Management System. International Organization for Standardization.
- OECD AI Principles. (2019). Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
- Tschantz, M. C., Datta, A., C Wing, J. M. (2014). Formalizing and Enforcing Purpose Restrictions in Privacy Policies. IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy.
- ENISA AI Threat Landscape. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Threat Landscape Report. European Union Agency for Cybersecurity.
- AI Risk Management Framework, NIST. (2023). Guidelines for Artificial Intelligence Risk Assessment and Management.
- ISO 22301. (2019). Business Continuity Management Systems. International Organization for Standardization.
- ISO 27040. (2015). Storage Security Standards. International Organization for Standardization.
- AI Security Guidelines. (2022). AI Security Recommendations for Enterprises.
- Huang, L., Joseph, A., C Nelson, B. (2020). Adversarial Machine Learning: Vulnerabilities and Countermeasures.
- IEEE AI Ethics Training. (2022). AI Ethics and Responsible AI Development Training Module.
- ISACA AI Governance Framework. (2021). Framework for AI Risk and Governance.
- CIS AI Security Controls. (2022). Cybersecurity Controls for Artificial Intelligence Systems.
- EU AI Act. (2023). Regulation of Artificial Intelligence in the European Union.
- ISO/IEC 38505-1. (2017). Governance of IT – Governance of Data – Part 1: Application of ISO/IEC 38500 to the Governance of Data.
Security governance necessitates a comprehensive transformation as artificial intelligence (AI) continues to
revolutionize industrial operations. ISO/IEC 42001 provides a standardized approach to address AI security risks, as well as
compliance andethical concerns.This paper examinesthe components ofISO42001, explaining how the standard establishes a
robustframework that enables bestpracticesand secure AI governance across various domains.