Authors : Wang Xiangxu; Chandra Mohan Vasudeva Panicker; Aminul Islam

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 5 - May

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3enuv33z

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/p866uwcp

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24MAY2486

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : Due to its apparent centrality in several conceptualizations of how to address the digital divide, this study highlights the heterogeneous development of so-called online abilities. Three major performance evaluations look at how age, gender, educational attainment, and the effectiveness and regularity of using the Services affect results. Knowledgeable with the ways of the Internet. There seems to be a generational deterioration in one's proficiency with any given media. However, when comparing ages on content-specific talents, the older age bracket always comes out on top. Their inexperience with the medium is holding them back and will have disastrous results. Studies of digital literacy have paid little attention to this result, if they are aware of it at all. The capacity to make productive use of the Internet in technological and material settings seems to be strongly impacted by educational level. Previous research has shown that people learn digital capabilities best via a combination of classroom teaching and hands-on practise. Time spent online only benefits non-medium- specific skills. This would imply that prolonged exposure to digital media does not lead to gains in skill related to processing digital material, regardless of how long one spends doing so or how often. The latter has a smaller effect on general skill levels. The study examined the performance of male and female students in both virtual and brick-and-mortar classrooms. The research found that regardless of the kind of instruction used, there was a statistically significant variation in the GPAs of the participants based on gender. Male and female students had similar perspectives on virtual and conventional classrooms.

Keywords : Online Learning, Traditional Textbook, Traditional Classroom, Traditional Learning.

References :

1. Amro, H., Mundy, M., & Kupczynski, L. (2015). The effects of age and gender on student achievement in face-to-face and online college algebra classes. Research in Higher Education Journal, 27, 1.
2. Bauer, J. (2015). Toward technology integration in the schools: Why it isn’t happening [Electronic version]. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 519-46.
3. Brocato, B., Bonanno, A, & Ulbig, S. (2015). Student perceptions and instructional evaluations: A multivariate analysis of online and face-to-face classroom settings. Education and Information Technologies, 20(1), 37-55.
4. Russell, M., O’Dwyer, L., Bebell, D., & Tao, W. (2017). How teachers’ uses of technology vary by tenure and longevity [Electronic version]. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 37(4), 393-417.
5. Datnow, A. (2020). The role of teachers in educational reform: A 20-year perspective. Journal of Educational Change, 21(1), 109–113. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339.
6. Eksail, F.A.A., Afari, E. (2020). Factors affecting trainee teachers’ intention to use technology: A structural equation modeling approach. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 2681–2697.
7. Harrison E. and McTavish, M. (2018). ‘i’Babies: Infants’ and Toddlers’ Emergent Language and Literacy in a Digital Culture of Idevices. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 18, 163-188.
8. Hasifah Binti Abdul, A. (2020). Keberkesanan Pembelajaran Menggunakan Forum Dalam Sistem ELearning: Kajian Kes Pelajar Tahun 4spi. Johor. Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
9. Hazwani Mohd N., Noor Raudhiah Abu B., and Norziah O. (2020). E-Pembelajaran Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Di Sebuah Institusi Pengajian Tinggi Selangor. Selangor. Malaysian atas talian. Journal of Education.
10. Hussin, N. (2017). Penggunaan Laman Web Sebagai Transformasi dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Pendidikan Islam. O-JIE: atas talian. Journal of Islamic Education, 1(2).
11. Irfan, F. and Iman Hermawan Sastra, K. (2020). Teachers Elementary School in atas talian Learning of COVID-19 Pandemic Conditions. Jakarta. Jurnal Iqra’.
12. Mailizar Almanthari, A., Maulina, S., and Bruce, S. (2020). Secondary School Mathematics Teachers’ Views On E-Learning Implementation Barriers During the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Case of Indonesia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(7), em1860.
13. Mansor, A. N., Zabarani, N. H., Jamaludin, K. A., Mohd Nor, M. Y., Alias, B. S., & Mansor, A. Z. (2021). Home-Based Learning (HBL) Teacher Readiness Scale: Instrument Development and Demographic Analysis. Sustainability, 13(4), 2228. MDPI AG. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13042228
14. Mat Dawi, A.H., Theam, L. S., Palaniandy, M. and Dolah, J. (2016). Penerimaan Alat Web 2.0 dalam Pelaksanaan Kurikulum Program Berasaskan Pembelajaran Abad Ke-21 di Institut Pendidikan Guru. Jurnal Penyelidikan Dedikasi, 10.
15. Majlis Keselamatan Negara, Jabatan Perdana Menteri. Dilayari di laman www.pmo.gov.my pada 28 Oktober 2020.