Authors : George Kimwomi; Kennedy Ondimu

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 3 - March

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/35p4x4u5

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/2cpsztzj

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25mar403

Google Scholar

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 15 to 20 days to display the article.

Abstract : Intellectual traits such as open-mindedness and humility play a crucial role in scientific inquiry by fostering a culture of critical thinking, collaboration, and adaptability. This study explores how these intellectual attributes influence scientific research, hypothesis testing, and peer review processes. Through a systematic literature review, key findings reveal that intellectual humility enhances epistemic curiosity, reduces cognitive biases, and improves scientific discourse. Open-mindedness, on the other hand, promotes interdisciplinary collaboration, facilitates paradigm shifts, and fosters scientific innovation. The study further discusses the implications of these traits in education, peer review, and research integrity. Given the growing need for adaptability in modern scientific practice, fostering intellectual humility and open- mindedness is essential for advancing knowledge production. Future research should explore empirical interventions that encourage these traits among scientists and educators to enhance the credibility and effectiveness of scientific inquiry.

Keywords : Intellectual Traits, Open-Mindedness, Humility Scientific Inquiry

References :

1. Council, N. R., Brunkhorst, B. J., & Bybee, R. W. (1995). National science education standards. National Academies Press.
2. Fiske, S. T., & Dupree, C. (2018). Gaining trust as well as respect in communicating to motivated audiences about science topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(37), 9334-9341.
3. Grossmann, I., Karasawa, M., Izumi, S., Na, J., Varnum, M. E. W., Kitayama, S., & Nisbett, R. E. (2022). A cultural perspective on emotion regulation: The role of cognitive reappraisal in well-being. Emotion, 22(3), 512-525.
4. Hecht, D., Harder, S., & Roberts, R. M. (2019). The impact of interdisciplinary collaboration on research outcomes: A systematic review. Research Policy, 48(8), 103739.
5. Krumrei-Mancuso, E. J., & Rouse, S. V. (2016). The development and validation of the Comprehensive Intellectual Humility Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(2), 209-221.
6. Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of science and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(3), 138–147.
7. Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2014). Nature of science and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 36(6), 811-836.
8. Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Bartos, S. A. (2014). The development of a validated assessment of students' and teachers' understandings of scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(10), 1386–1408.
9. Porter, T., & Schumann, K. (2018). Intellectual humility and openness to the opposing view. Self and Identity, 17(2), 139–162.
10. Porter, T., Schumann, K., & Crockett, M. (2022). Intellectual humility predicts less polarization on contested scientific issues. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(4), 475–487.
11. Rönnebeck, S., Bernholt, S., & Ropohl, M. (2016). The role of confirmation bias in scientific reasoning. International Journal of Science Education, 38(15), 2347–2371.
12. Rönnebeck, S., Bernholt, S., & Ropohl, M. (2016). The role of open-mindedness in science education: A theoretical and empirical review. Science Education, 100(1), 110-134.
13. Sinatra, G. M., & Hofer, B. K. (2016). Public understanding of science: Policy and educational implications. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(2), 245-253.
14. Snow, C. P. (2024). The two cultures and the scientific revolution. Cambridge University Press.
15. Spiegel, J. S. (2012). Open-mindedness and intellectual humility. Theory and Research in Education, 10(1), 27-38.
16. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 645-665.
17. Tang, X., Coffey, J. E., Elby, A., & Levin, D. M. (2009). The scientific method and scientific inquiry: Tensions in teaching and learning. Science Education, 94(1), 29-47.
18. Taylor, J. (2016). The role of intellectual humility in scientific practice. Philosophy of Science, 83(3), 375-394.
19. Vanney, C., & Cecchi, L. (2024). Fostering epistemic curiosity and collaborative problem-solving through intellectual humility. Educational Psychology Review, 36(2), 219-238.
20. Whitcomb, D., Battaly, H., Baehr, J., & Howard-Snyder, D. (2017). Intellectual humility: Owning our limitations. Philosophy Compass, 12(3), e12327.
21. Zagzebski, L. (2001). Virtue epistemology. The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology, 15(3), 34-49.