A Study of Blood Deposition Pattern on Various Surfaces: Analysing the Impact of Different Application over Time


Authors : Hridhya. H.; Sreya Menon

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 4 - April


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/m9trmerf

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/nhpkbfhr

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25apr1298

Google Scholar

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 15 to 20 days to display the article.


Abstract : Forensic bloodstain pattern analysis (BPA) is essential in crime scene reconstruction, offering insights into the cause, nature, and timing of blood deposition. This study examines how blood interacts with different surfaces—glass, tile, cloth, wood, and paper—using application methods such as dripping, splattering, and pooling. Fresh pig blood was used due to its similarity to human blood. Blood samples were deposited on selected surfaces and documented over 24 hours. Imagej software was used for grayscale conversion and edge detection, enhancing forensic interpretation. Results showed that non- porous surfaces (glass, tile) maintained welldefined stains, making time estimation more accurate, while porous surfaces (cloth, paper, wood) led to diffusion and absorption, complicating analysis. Time-dependent changes such as shrinkage, darkening, and coagulation were more evident on non-porous surfaces, reinforcing their forensic reliability. Findings confirm that surface characteristics and application methods significantly impact bloodstain patterns. Digital imaging enhances interpretation, improving forensic accuracy. This study refines BPA methodologies, aiding in crime scene reconstruction and legal evaluation of blood evidence. Future research should explore additional surfaces and integrate advanced imaging techniques to further enhance forensic reliability.

Keywords : Blood Spatter Analysis, Pooling, Splashing, Dripping, Time Since Deposition.

References :

  1. Alexis R. Weber, Igor K. Lednev. (2020). Crime clock – Analytical studies for approximating time since deposition of bloodstains. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forc.2020.100248
  2. B. Karger, S. Rand , T. Fracasso, H. Pfeiffer (2008). Bloodstain pattern analysis—Casework experience. DOI: https://doi.org/.10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.07.010
  3. Bethany AJ Larkin, Craig E Banks. (2014). Exploring the applicability of equine blood to bloodstain pattern analysis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0025802414542456
  4. Bethany A J Larkin 1, Craig E Banks. (2016). Exploring the applicability of equine blood to bloodstain pattern analysis. DOI: 10.1177/0025802414542456
  5. Craig D. Adam.(2012). Fundamental studies of bloodstain formation and characteristics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.12.002
  6. D.R. Cavalcanti, L.P. Silva .(2019) Application of atomic force microscopy in the analysis of time since deposition (TSD) of red blood cells in bloodstains: A forensic analysis.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.05.048
  7. D. Brutin, B. Sobac, B. Loquet and J. Sampol.(2010). formation in drying drops of blood. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112010005070
  8. David Brutin, Benjamin Sobac, Celin Nicloux.(2012). Influence of Substrate Nature on the Evaporation of a Sessile Drop of Blood. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4006033
  9. Daniel Attinger, Craig Moore, Adam Donaldson, Arian Jafari, Howard A. Stone.(2013). Fluid dynamics topics in bloodstain pattern analysis: Comparative review and research opportunities. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.04.018
  10. Daniel Attinger, Craig Moore, Adam Donaldson, Arian Jafari, Howard A. Stone. (2013). Fluid dynamics topics in bloodstain pattern analysis: Comparative review and research opportunities. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.04.018
  11. D R Cavalcanti 1, L P Silva.(2019). Application of atomic force microscopy in the analysis of time since deposition (TSD) of red blood cells in bloodstains: A forensic analysis. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.05.048
  12. F.R. Smith, D. Brutin (2018) Wetting and spreading of human blood: Recent advances and applications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2018.01.013

Forensic bloodstain pattern analysis (BPA) is essential in crime scene reconstruction, offering insights into the cause, nature, and timing of blood deposition. This study examines how blood interacts with different surfaces—glass, tile, cloth, wood, and paper—using application methods such as dripping, splattering, and pooling. Fresh pig blood was used due to its similarity to human blood. Blood samples were deposited on selected surfaces and documented over 24 hours. Imagej software was used for grayscale conversion and edge detection, enhancing forensic interpretation. Results showed that non- porous surfaces (glass, tile) maintained welldefined stains, making time estimation more accurate, while porous surfaces (cloth, paper, wood) led to diffusion and absorption, complicating analysis. Time-dependent changes such as shrinkage, darkening, and coagulation were more evident on non-porous surfaces, reinforcing their forensic reliability. Findings confirm that surface characteristics and application methods significantly impact bloodstain patterns. Digital imaging enhances interpretation, improving forensic accuracy. This study refines BPA methodologies, aiding in crime scene reconstruction and legal evaluation of blood evidence. Future research should explore additional surfaces and integrate advanced imaging techniques to further enhance forensic reliability.

Keywords : Blood Spatter Analysis, Pooling, Splashing, Dripping, Time Since Deposition.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe