Authors :
Joseph Owolabi; Ojadi Pius
Volume/Issue :
Volume 7 - 2022, Issue 5 - May
Google Scholar :
https://bit.ly/3IIfn9N
Scribd :
https://bit.ly/3OhIFiV
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6716134
Abstract :
The most challenges to electrical power
system supply is mainly faults in transmission line and
there is need for quick faults isolation in order to remove
damages as a result of power outage. This paper
compared together the two methods of symmetrical
component method of (1) and artificial neural network
method of (11) to determine their effectiveness. The two
methods were subjected to simpower system,under
normal and fault conditions using Akure – Ikeji Arakeji
– Ilesha transmission line . Three phases were used,
single line, double line, and line to line, all to the
qround faults.In symmetrical component, faults in both
the currents and impedance were detected, also in the
artificial neural network both the faulty voltages and
currents were detected. The comparison between the two
methods show that the symmetrical component method,
needs computation of faults in the impedance, this does
not have genuine application for isolation of faults
compared to artificial neural network method which has
fault isolation application but no impedance calculation
and have datathat gives correct results as quickly as
possible. Also this method is very fast, effective and
simple. Therefore, the artificial neural method is better
because of it is simplicity and accuracy than the
symmetrical component method.
The most challenges to electrical power
system supply is mainly faults in transmission line and
there is need for quick faults isolation in order to remove
damages as a result of power outage. This paper
compared together the two methods of symmetrical
component method of (1) and artificial neural network
method of (11) to determine their effectiveness. The two
methods were subjected to simpower system,under
normal and fault conditions using Akure – Ikeji Arakeji
– Ilesha transmission line . Three phases were used,
single line, double line, and line to line, all to the
qround faults.In symmetrical component, faults in both
the currents and impedance were detected, also in the
artificial neural network both the faulty voltages and
currents were detected. The comparison between the two
methods show that the symmetrical component method,
needs computation of faults in the impedance, this does
not have genuine application for isolation of faults
compared to artificial neural network method which has
fault isolation application but no impedance calculation
and have datathat gives correct results as quickly as
possible. Also this method is very fast, effective and
simple. Therefore, the artificial neural method is better
because of it is simplicity and accuracy than the
symmetrical component method.