Authors : Joseph Wheeder; Sivaram Ponnusamy; Mohammad Muqeem; Pawan R Bhaladhare

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 6 - June

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2p8253sk

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/3598u2f4

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUN210

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : During recent years, vehicular ad hoc networks, or VANETs, have emerged as one of the most exciting and difficult study fields. VANET is regarded as a subset of MANET, or mobile ad hoc network, which is primarily used on automobiles. With the use of traffic data, VANET hopes to supply an advanced Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) with a wealth of information. Mention how daily traffic data collection helps with transportation planning, particularly with regard to intra-city communication. Two of the main issues with the existing traffic system are jams in traffic and accidents. Around the world, numerous people lose their lives or suffer severe injuries in traffic accidents each year. Human lives on the road are directly impacted by these issues. VANET can help to avert these mishaps and facilitate the efficient operation of daily traffic. Furthermore, VANET offers a plethora of intriguing applications, including real-time traffic condition monitoring, dynamic route scheduling, blind crossing prevention, safety, and more. In addition, there are certain drawbacks in terms of traffic and security. The absence of a centralised infrastructure in VANET is one of the main security issues. One of the most difficult jobs in the resultant decentralised and self- organizing VANETs is the administration of the wireless channel to make an efficient use of its capacity because there is no centralised infrastructure in charge of synchronisation and coordination of transmissions. VANET is primarily used to lower the risk of accidents in urban areas with a high volume and complexity of vehicles. We introduce the VANET Security R&D Ecosystem and examine traffic in this article. The four main components of the R&D ecosystem are end customers, government agencies, automakers, and university research. Every facet of VANET is covered in detail. Our study primarily focuses on the security and traffic within VANETs, including how data is safeguarded from vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V), vehicle-to-roadside infrastructure communications devices (V2I), access points, and other sources.

References :

1. 1. Sheikh, Liang, Wang, 2019, ‘A Survey of Security Services, Attacks, and Applications for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)’, MDPI, PP 10-14.
   2. Rajkumar, Nithya, P. Hemalatha. ‘Overview Of Vanet with Its Features and Security Attacks’, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), Vol. 03, no. 01.
   3. Mostofa Kamal Nasir, A.S.M. Delowar Hossain, Md. Sazzad Hossain, Md. Mosaddik Hasan, Md. Belayet Ali, ‘Security Challenges And Implementation Mechanism For Vehicular Ad Hoc Network’, International journal of scientific & technology research volume 2, issue 4, april 2013.
   4.  Ahmed Yasser, M. Zorkany & Neamat Abdel Kader | (2017) ‘VANET routing protocol for V2V implementation: A suitable solution for developing countries, Cogent Engineering,’  4:1, 1362802, DOI: 10.1080/23311916.2017.1362802
   5. Johnson, D.B. and Maltz, D.A. (1996) Dynamic Source Routing in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks. Mobile Computing, 353, 153-181.
   6. Chakraborty, 2022 ‘Performance Analysis of VANET Based Routing Protocol’, ResearchGate, vol. 13.
   7. Chaubey, 2016 ‘Security Analysis of Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs): A Comprehensive Study’ ResearchGate.
   8. Mahmood, Duan, Yang, Wang, Nebhen, Bhutta, 2021, ‘Security in Vehicular Ad Hoc network: Challenges and Countermeasures’ Hindawi, PP- 3-6.
   9. Johnson B., Maltz A., Broch, ‘DSR: The Dynamic Source Routing protocol for Multi-Hop Wireless Ad Hoc Networks’ Carnegie Mellon University, PP 3-6;
   10. J. Pan, S. Paul and R. Jain, "A survey of the research on future internet architectures," in IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 26-36, July 2011, doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2011.5936152.
   11. R. Mishra, A. Singh and R. Kumar, "VANET security: Issues, challenges and solutions," 2016 International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, and Optimization Techniques (ICEEOT), 2016, pp. 1050-1055, doi: 10.1109/ICEEOT.2016.7754846.
   12. P. G. Shinde and M. M. Dongre, "Traffic congestion detection with complex event processing in VANET," 2017 Fourteenth International Conference on Wireless and Optical Communications Networks (WOCN), 2017, pp. 1-5, doi: 10.1109/WOCN.2017.8065852.
   13. Y. Xia, X. Qin, B. Liu and P. Zhang, "A greedy traffic light and queue aware routing protocol for urban VANETs," in China Communications, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 77-87, July 2018, doi: 10.1109/CC.2018.8424605.
   14. S. S. Sepasgozar and S. Pierre, "Network Traffic Prediction Model Considering Road Traffic Parameters Using Artificial Intelligence Methods in VANET," in IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 8227-8242, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3144112.
   15. V. Hemakumar and H. Nazini, "Optimized traffic signal control system at traffic intersections using VANET," IET Chennai Fourth International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Intelligent Systems (SEISCON 2013), 2013, pp. 305-312, doi: 10.1049/ic.2013.0330.